I just wanted to update you on the meeting today. @mjue_wmf has volunteered to help you get up to speed with our process for copyediting the questions. This is very important step - to catch problems in how we are wording questions.

@Niharika Sounds good - Thanks!

@Elitre I got a survey in my email today about this - did I already fill it out? should I not fill it out again?

Ah okay. It will probably take a 2-3 hours to read through all the questions and provide comments, plus the one hour training the week before. Let me know if that is too much, I can try to find someone else to help.

Thanks so much @Johan! Also thanks for the lesson in tvar links. I never seem to get them right, so that is helpful. I've marked it for translation :)

@Neil_P._Quinn_WMF Great! Thanks for confirming you are unblocked :)

Thanks @Nuria That makes sense to me and I can add it to the plan. @mcruzWMF and I talked about what this project might look like for next fiscal:

Thanks @Nuria. I think adding a research component to the project next year would be a great idea. I'd like to start working on a rough roadmap for this work and what it might look like, so we have a clearer scope and milestones.

@Nuria To some extent, this report interface should be how other teams are structuring and thinking about their survey projects. All survey projects have goals and audiences, so this information should be represented in the metadata for each question which is how the report is displayed.

@Elitre , @Aklapper, yes that is where I've been documenting some things. We also have https://office.wikimedia.org/wiki/Surveys as a rough checklist of staff to follow when doing a survey. Its going to be hard to set all the guidelines, policies, and checklists up front. In my opinion, starting small and seeing how things go is the best way. Also, a survey is not just software. There is a lot that goes into planning a survey, as well as learning and using results. That is something that a tool cannot fully solve for, and we may want to think about the people processes as well as the tool. In general, asking people to take surveys where we don't use results would be unethical and could harm response rates over time for some of our audiences. I'm happy to help advise as needed!

@mcruzWMF Can you upload the screenshots? I was going to upload to commons but I wasn't sure if there are attributions needed for the pdf. Thanks!

Thanks @Aklapper I asked OIT and they said we need to ask ops about this. Thanks for the update.

Please keep access for me (chedasaurus). We use it for our quarterly metrics. Thanks!

Thanks @Nemo_bis for the ping on this.

Thanks @Aklapper ! Perhaps a few of us can start to explore the software as a potential solution before we do the security review. I may have time to start this next quarter. @Elitre - would you like to be involved with this? Anyone else I should ask to help? Thanks!

Hi @Elitre ! That would be the security team, I just don't expect this is high on their priority or ours at this time, but it is definitely on my radar for the long-term. The security review might be just one part. I think we also need to think about managing the account and examining at how the software will work for our needs. @dpatrick - anything you can say from the security side? When might you have bandwidth to help with reviewing this software for Foundation use? Thanks!

Thanks @Trizek and @ThatAndromeda. I've figured out a way to export a csv and translate using google sheets. It's easy/fast to use, even though its not ideal (because its google). But still looking forward to the mediawiki translation :)

@Trizek-WMF Sorry - I'm not sure why I didn't respond the your last comment about numbers. With 500 responses, you should be good to go with the scale questions that compare wikitext to flow.

Do you have a way to send reminders? Re-post the survey etc? I understand this can be trick on wiki spaces. But typically you want to post about 3 reminders.