Showing changes from revision #12 to #13:
Added | Removed | Changed
With braiding
With duals for objects
category with duals (list of them)
dualizable object (what they have)
ribbon category, a.k.a. tortile category
With duals for morphisms
monoidal dagger-category?
With traces
Closed structure
Special sorts of products
Semisimplicity
Morphisms
Internal monoids
Examples
Theorems
In higher category theory
abstract duality: opposite category,
concrete duality: dual object, dualizable object, fully dualizable object, dualizing object
Examples
between higher geometry/higher algebra
Langlands duality, geometric Langlands duality, quantum geometric Langlands duality
In QFT and String theory
Being dualizable is often thought of as a category-theoretic notion of finiteness for objects in a monoidal category. For instance, a vector space is dualizable in Vect with its tensor product just when it is finite-dimensional, and a spectrum is dualizable in the stable homotopy category with its smash product just when it is a finite cell spectrum.
A more precise intuition is that an object is dualizable if its “size” is no larger than the “additivity” of the monoidal category. Since Vect and the stable homotopy category are finitely additive, but not infinitely so, dualizability there is a notion of finiteness. This is the case for many monoidal categories in which one considers dualizability. However, in a monoidal category which is not additive at all, such as Set (or any cartesian monoidal category), only the terminal object is dualizable—whereas in an “infinitely additive” monoidal category such as Rel or Sup, many “infinite” objects are dualizable. (In , all objects are dualizable.)
There are other notions of “dual object”, distinct from this one. See for example dual object in a closed category, and also the discussion at category with duals.
An object in a monoidal category is dualizable if it has an adjoint when regarded as a morphism in the one-object delooping bicategory corresponding to . Its adjoint in is called its dual in and often written as .
If is braided then left and right adjoints in are equivalent; otherwise one speaks of being left dualizable or right dualizable.
Unfortunately, conventions on left and right vary and sometimes contradict their use for adjoints. But if we define right duals to be the same as right adjoints in , then (where a right dual of is an interpreted object as composition, with the traditional Leibnizian order of composition as opposed to diagrammatic order), then a right dual of is an object equipped with a unit (or coevaluation)
and counit (or evaluation)
satisfying the ‘triangle identities’ familiar from the concept of adjunction. Of course, in a symmetric monoidal category, there is no difference between left and right duals.
If every object of has a left and right dual, then is called a rigid monoidal category or an autonomous monoidal category. If it is additionally symmetric, it is called a compact closed category.
See category with duals for more discussion.
Let be a finite-dimensional vector space over a field , and let be its usual dual vector space. We can define to be the obvious pairing. If we also choose a finite basis of , and let be the dual basis of , then we can define by sending to . It is easy to check the triangle identities, so is a dual of in .
Let be a finite-dimensional manifold, choose an embedding for some , and let be the Thom spectrum of the normal bundle of this embedding. Then the Thom collapse map defines an which exhibits as a dual of in the stable homotopy category. This is a version of Spanier-Whitehead duality.
Dualizable objects support a good abstract notion of trace.
An object in a symmetric monoidal (∞,n)-category is called dualizable if it is so as an object in the ordinary symmetric monoidal homotopy category .
This appears as (Lurie, def. 2.3.5).
This means that an object in is dualizable if there exists unit and counit 1-morphism that satisfy the triangle identity up to homotopy. The definition does not demand that this homotopy is coherent (that it satisfies itself higher order relations up to higher order k-morphisms).
If the structure morphisms of the adjunction of a dualizable object have themselves all adjoints, then the object is called a fully dualizable object.
As before, we may equivalently state this after delooping the monoidal structure and passing to the -category . Then has duals for objects precisely if has all adjoints.
Duals in a monoidal category are a very classical notion. A large number of examples can be found in
The notion of duals in a symmetric monoidal -category is due to section 2.3 of
Revision on September 15, 2012 at 19:36:22 by Todd Trimble See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.