Wikivoyage/Logo/2013/R1/v/Plane2.png

Wikivoyage Logo

Election 2013

Background • FAQ • Translate • Results

Isatis78: Plane 2 - It looks like both an open book and an airplane. It invites to open, read and write., Plane2.png

Instructions

Any contributor registered on any Wikimedia Foundation project prior to May 31, 2013 is eligible to vote. The process will be using weighted voting to ensure fair representation to Wikivoyage contributors. Wikivoyage contributors include anyone who has made 50 mainspace edits to Wikivoyage prior to May 31, 2013.

If you vote for more than one logo, please vote for them in order of your preference. The first one you choose is your first choice; the second one, your second choice, and the third one is your third choice. Your votes will be tallied in that order.

This is not a secret ballot. Your choices are recorded in your contributions and are consequently publicly visible.

Only votes by logged-in users are accepted.
One vote per logo. Three votes in total.
To vote manually, append the following text at the end:
```
# [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|]]
```

Comments [edit]

The following conversation is taken from Wikivoyage/Logo 2013/Submissions#Option 3 - Plane 2:

It looks like both an open book and an airplane. It invites to open, read and write. --NaBUru38 (talk) 22:12, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like you don't need to confine yourself to the Wikimedia shades. Was that your natural choice for both logos, or was it to reinforce brand identity? Qardys (talk) 23:22, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I remember this logo, and I really like the excellet idea that is behind it. Maybe (although I don't know how) I would graphically enforce these two concept, because without the explanation they don't arrive immediately. Once you know them, are clear, and are clear as well after several observation, but in my opinion a logo should be clear since the first glance. --Andyrom75 (talk) 07:26, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To me it looks like neither an open book nor an aircraft, even when I am told it should. I can see the attempted resemblance, but for me it just does not gel. That which makes it look somewhat like an aircraft, detracts from the book-like aspects and vice versa. · · · Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 09:46, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can see the book but no aircraft. Wikivoyage is not Wikibooks, I dont want confusion. --Pyfisch (talk) 10:09, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great idea. It was my first choice during the first round already and it will be my first choice. Really like it. -- Der Fussi 13:16, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that this submission breaks the rules: it was created by User:Isatis78 while submitted by User:NaBUru38. //Shell 07:31, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Isatis78 has now confirmed agreement to the logo submission rules here. Restoring this one to discussion. I've retitled this section according to the creator's original title. --Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 20:53, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see plane, I see only book. Good idea, bad realization. Alex Spade (talk) 12:06, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I like it very much. --Pequod76^(talk) 08:36, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Very Wiki! I vastly prefer this to something 100% travel-generic, even if it might be slightly difficult to interpret for some viewers. Pratyeka (talk) 03:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, I see a bird into it, and it reminds me of the logo of Partij voor de Vrijheid (Freedom Party), a controversial Dutch political party. Obviously, it doesn't have my preference. Effeietsanders (talk) 11:05, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Instructions

Comments [edit]

Votes