Abstract Wikipedia/Wikifunctions logo concept/Proposal 8
![]() |
|
Voting
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support sB talk 02:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Fabro (talk) 01:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Support I like it. It's simple and beautiful. Luk3 (talk) 02:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Support This is simple and abstract, looks like a Snake with a crown. Its color scheme is very good, but it seems a bit monotonous. Unconnected lines will make it easier to identify the w and =. YFdyh000 (talk) 03:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Chaddy (talk) 03:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Juan90264 (talk) 03:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Support minhhuy (talk) 04:12, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Babu (talk) 06:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Support This one has aesthetic comfort and signifies progress, also in the design (most of, if not all, the other concepts already look twenty years old to me). Eissink (talk) 08:46, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Support TFerenczy (talk) 09:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Jon Harald Søby (talk) 10:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Support — Jules Talk 10:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Elegant, explanatory, simple also while stuffing in the concepts of "function" and "output" and also looking like an acronym. Yair rand (talk) 11:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Support RZuo (talk) 12:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Support First preference Strainu (talk) 12:31, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Tgr (talk) 13:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Support — Bru Water (talk) 18:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Simply, clear for every people Maria.martelli (talk) 19:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Support LivelyRatification (talk) 01:46, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Support I'm not sure about the gradient but I like the W= idea. Anon423 (talk) 02:53, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Pewdiepie12321 (talk) 09:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Kahniel (talk) 12:22, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Nice Đức Anh (talk) 14:31, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Serhio Magpie (talk) 20:00, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Support The F is kind of hard to see. Cortex128 (talk) 21:07, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Support —Eihel (talk) 16:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Bencemac (talk) 08:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Neil Shah-Quinn (talk) 08:38, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Support seav (talk) 13:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Casual (talk) 14:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Support My daughter's choice :) denny (talk) 16:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Susanna Giaccai (talk) 16:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Aca (talk) 16:24, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Support CEllen (talk) 19:31, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Support ❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 08:00, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Support WikiLuke (talk) 12:27, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Emaus (talk) 13:58, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Support distinctive and cool Nweil (talk) 19:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Nicereddy (talk) 00:28, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Daniel Mietchen (talk) 03:41, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Premeditated (talk) 12:44, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Sometimes, less is just more. Candidate no. 1 for me. YjM (talk) 15:51, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Poslovitch (talk) 19:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Support KirkLU (talk) 07:53, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Support — putnik 08:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Support JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 13:18, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 22:13, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Support TSK201911 (talk) 13:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Ideal! Vit; talk 12:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Support BugWarp (talk) 17:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Support SSastry (WMF) (talk) 18:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Stevenliuyi (talk) 19:30, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Ата (talk) 05:57, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Quiddity (talk) 17:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Matma Rex (talk) 18:02, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.