Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2017/Votes/Sjoerddebruin: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Voted neutral
Brateevsky (talk | contribs)
400 edits
Voted neutral
Line 93: Line 93:
#: {{Se-vote|2017|Cpiebtanz|checked=n|cb=Stryn}} [[User:Cpiebtanz|Cpiebtanz]] ([[User talk:Cpiebtanz|talk]]) 18:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
#: {{Se-vote|2017|Cpiebtanz|checked=n|cb=Stryn}} [[User:Cpiebtanz|Cpiebtanz]] ([[User talk:Cpiebtanz|talk]]) 18:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2017|Cybularny|checked=|cb=}} ~'''[[User:Cybularny|<font face="Comic Sans MS" color="#00 00 CD">'''Cybularny'''</font>]] '''[[User talk:Cybularny|<u><sup><font face="Book Antiqua" color="#FF 00 00">'''''Speak?'''''</font></sup></u>]] 19:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2017|Cybularny|checked=|cb=}} ~'''[[User:Cybularny|<font face="Comic Sans MS" color="#00 00 CD">'''Cybularny'''</font>]] '''[[User talk:Cybularny|<u><sup><font face="Book Antiqua" color="#FF 00 00">'''''Speak?'''''</font></sup></u>]] 19:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2017|Brateevsky|checked=|cb=}} [[User:Brateevsky|Brateevsky]] ([[User talk:Brateevsky|talk]]) 20:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:09, 9 February 2017

Warning

The 2017 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Sjoerddebruin

ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: nl-N, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello everyone,

    My name is Sjoerd de Bruin and I was born in the Netherlands. I've been actively contributing to Wikipedia since 2010 and became sysop on the Dutch Wikipedia in November 2013. Wikidata followed in 2013, where I've became sysop in February 2014 and oversighter in August 2015. I'm also helping on OTRS since January 2014. Also has been a member of the Arbitration Committee of the Dutch Wikipedia since March 2016. My main language is Dutch and I have advanced knowledge of English.

    In the last year, I have noticed a lack of active stewards on IRC in, for example, the European mornings. Urgent locks and oversights need to wait a long time for attention. I can complain about that, but I can also try to do something about it. This is one of main reasons why I've nominated myself this year. I'm always online to help people out, the same applies for international and local events in real-life! I have a decent amount of knowledge about LTA's and other situations on various Wikimedia projects.

    As steward, I would like to help with handeling (urgent) IRC requests and requests on the various pages on Meta. I hope the community will support me while I do the same to them.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2017/Questions#Sjoerddebruin


Yes

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Admin on two large wikis, and ArbCom experience on nlwiki (which shows dispute resolution experience - sometimes is useful in dealing with difficult issues), as well as experience handling private information. As far as the incident I mentioned on the questions page, that was two years ago and I think that the candidate has proven, both by what they have said subsequently, and by their work as an oversighter on Wikidata, that they have the right attitude in regards to privacy. Rschen7754 14:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Milesjolly1997 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Milesjolly1997 (talk) 14:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Natuur12 (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  GZWDer (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Good to go! Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Vituzzu (talk) 14:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Lingveno (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Lingveno (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Ks-M9 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 •  --Ks-M9 [disc.] 14:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Pearli (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017 •  Pearli (talk) 14:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Nuhaa (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017 •  Nuhaa (talk) 15:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017 •  Miniapolis 15:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. -revi (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  — regards, Revi 15:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017 •  Mainly per Rschen7754. Jasper Deng (talk) 15:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15. NickK (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017 •  While he is not the most experienced candidate, he has a rather diverse experience including Arbcom membership on Dutch Wikipedia and oversight rights on Wikidata. Answers are good as well. This is enough for me to support the candidate — NickK (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Satnam S Virdi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Satnam S Virdi (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Stryn (talk) 15:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  He seems to understand the responsibilities, has the right attitude, has experience in some areas, has specific ideas of where he can and wants to contribute and has a surprisingly good command of English for a Dutchman. Thumbs up. Stevenmitchell (talk) 15:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Sabri76 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Mainly per Rschen7754.--Sabri76 (talk) 15:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 17:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Hannes 24 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  --Hannes 24 (talk) 17:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Ankry (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Ankry (talk) 17:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Luke081515 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Luke081515 18:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Kippenvlees1 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Kippenvlees1 (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Taketa (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Taketa (talk) 19:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Terry77 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Terry77 (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  26. AmaryllisGardener (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  AmaryllisGardener talk 19:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  28. 12345danNL (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  12345danNL (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Adog104 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Adog104 Talk to me 19:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Elvesham (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Elvesham (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Aledownload (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Aledownload (talk) 20:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Ascánder (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Ascánder (talk) 20:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  33. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  StevenJ81 (talk) 20:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mbch331 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Mbch331 (talk) 21:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Lawrence142002 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  I'm not sure that inexperience should disqualify a candidate and all their answers were acceptable. Lawrence142002 (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  35. TheDragonhunter (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  TheDragonhunter (talk) 21:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Hoo man (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Hoo man (talk) 22:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 22:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Rxy (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  rxy (talk) 23:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  39. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  Make an all-out effort. Eager Lin (Message) 00:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Courcelles 01:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Jusjih (talk) 04:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Mirer (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Mirer (talk) 05:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Mykola Swarnyk (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Mykola Swarnyk (talk) 05:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Geagea (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Geagea (talk) 06:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Rodejong (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Kind regards,  Rodejong  💬 ✉️  09:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Rzuwig► 09:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017 •  Shizhao (talk) 09:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  48. TBloemink (Eligible, checked by Jerrykim306)2017 •  I could not be less confident that this highly committed user will do an excellent job — TBloemink talk 11:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  спасибо за вашу помощь, в том числе на IRC Gryllida 11:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Openskye (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Openskye (talk) 12:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Martix (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Martix (talk) 12:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Xxmarijnw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Xxmarijnw (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Sacha47 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Sacha47 (talk) 15:39, 09. Februar 2017 (UTC)
  53. Joshualouie711 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Joshualouie711 (talk) 17:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Ghilt (Verification pending) •  Ghilt (talk) 19:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  55. KGirlTrucker81 (Verification pending) •  KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 19:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Nutcracker100 (Verification pending) •  Nutcracker100 (talk) 19:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No

  2. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Alchimista)2017 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 14:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Unfortunately, I am not convinced about his aptitude for stewardship. It's hard to know from the statement and the questions whether he understood the role and its policies well or not (especially because he only gave one short answer to the interesting questions for all candidates, even though there was at least one week time for all of this). I have to say however that he handled the theoretical situation question I asked him well. --MF-W 14:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  KPFC 💬 14:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  While trusted, I would like to see more involvement in cross-wiki activities. —Ah3kal (talk) 17:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 20:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. DCB (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  DCB (talk) 21:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Agree with above Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  No activity on Wikiversity! Sorry! --Marshallsumter (talk) 23:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Alex Khimich (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Alex Khimich (talk) 09:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017 •  MoiraMoira (talk) 09:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC) no trust in this candidates ethics. Also not very active as admin/cross wiki.[reply]
  12. Érico (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Per Ah3kal. Please, gain more cross-wiki experience and run again next year. Érico (talk) 13:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  No cross-wiki experience, and alegation for his candidature is absurd. Leon saudanha (talk) 14:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  The Banner (talk) 14:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC) No cross-wiki experience, not enough knowledge of other languages[reply]
  15. Pigsonthewing (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16. IJzeren Jan (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  Sjoerd, I honestly think you are a very nice person and I'm sure you mean well. But since your activity both as a moderator and as an Arbcom member on nlwiki (can't speak for Wikidata/Commons) is minimal, I really don't see how taking yet another hat it going to improve that. IJzeren Jan (talk) 15:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  2. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  I do trust Sjoerd, but he is not the most experienced user in areas which concern steward work. The hypothetical situation on the questions was handled well, though. I'm undecided. Vogone (talk) 14:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Emir of Wikipedia (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 • I have not seen the user enough cross-wiki patrolling work, however, I think it could equally be useful in some areas of stewards work. File:Alvaro Molina.png Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 14:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  B20180 (talk) 15:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Rogi.Official (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Unknown Rogi 16:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. QEDK (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  QEDK (talk) 16:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 01:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. BDaniel (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  BDaniel (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Cpiebtanz (Not eligible, checked by Stryn) •  Cpiebtanz (talk) 18:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Cybularny (Verification pending) •  ~Cybularny Speak? 19:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Brateevsky (Verification pending) •  Brateevsky (talk) 20:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2017/Votes/Sjoerddebruin&oldid=16305233"