Wikidata:Property proposal/tartan image

‎tartan image

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic

Not done

Description	image of the item's tartan
Represents	tartan (Q216797)
Data type	Item
Example 1	Duke of Rothesay (Q1059510)→https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Prince_of_Rothesay_tartan_(Vestiarium_Scoticum).png
Example 2	Clan Scott (Q913761)→https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Scott_tartan_(Vestiarium_Scoticum).png
Example 3	Burberry (Q390107)→https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Burberry_pattern.svg
Source	https://www.tartanregister.gov.uk/index
Expected completeness	always incomplete (Q21873886)

Motivation

A lot of organizations, clans, families, individuals have their own tartan. Tartans can be done the same way how coat of arms and flags are encoded into Wikidata.

Discussion

Oppose We should not repeat the same mistakes made with coat of arms properties. We can use the tartan item with P18: Duke of Rothesay (Q1059510)<tartan><tartan item>image (P18)File:Prince_of_Rothesay_tartan_(Vestiarium_Scoticum).png. --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 21:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Tinker Bell Can I ask what mistakes were made with the CoA properties? Jhowie Nitnek 18:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'm talking about redundancy: coat of arms image (P94) is redundant because the same relationship can be expressed by doing <item>coat of arms (P237)<item for CoA>image (P18). Having these extra properties make more difficult reusing data, because an user has to be aware of all of these ways to express data, instead of just one. --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 21:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    - @Tinker Bell Then you could say the same for flag image right? Jhowie Nitnek 20:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      - @JhowieNitnek: Yes. --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 20:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose in lieu of the item-based proposal, per Tinker Bell. Arlo Barnes (talk) 20:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done, not created per lack of support. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 06:54, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]