Thought that comes in too late You would watch this and start with "Oh, this is one of those world ending apocalyptic shows".
Then you realize "Oh, this is one of those middle east centered shows and some white guy or girl is going to be culprit in the end" (the worst thing about every single show that centers on middle east is music. Stop using middle eastern-ish music. That isn't cool anymore. It never was.)
You continue to watch and then realize "oh this is one those potential
"world ending" tv series with one family taken as case study".
All of these are true and none of this is true.
They have tried to make it original and maybe if it was 20 years back, it would be but sadly it is not.
For those who know climate change, and for AGW they might secretly or openly agree to it.
For those who oppose it, they would brand it as justification of eco terrorism.
No matter what your view point is, a valid thought, which comes in last 5 minutes of last episode is this: technologies that could be developed and being developed are taking backseat or plain ignored or even worse suppressed would only be possible if oil went away. So far, and it's COP27 now which means it's been 27 years since we started to try to do away with oil, we haven't had any luck. In fact energy demand of world is increasing.
The *infrastructure* that is ready for that demand is only one - oil and coal. That begs the question, what do you do?
If you were a smoker and your arteries are 70-80% blocked, would you reduce smoking or stop it?
The choice world has is this: should be do away with oil\coal in next 20 years and salvage what we can or rely on technologies that are not ready yet (carbon removal from air) and hope for best?