Far better than its reviews Sometimes, I ask myself: What is wrong with people?
Using some "benchmark" movie like Avatar as a comparison, the huge difference between the movies is their budget. Not more. Not less.
Yeah, hate me for that, but it's true: If movies aren't hyped, people tend to downvote well done titles just for... not being flooded into social media.
Replicas does show good acting. Reeves is charismatic without replicating (sic!) his other roles. Wifey, kids, villain, buddy.. everything alright.
The book is okay and doesn't pull the classic cringeworthy "oh no, please, don't kidnap $name that is boring" strings too much. No lengths. No boredom. No s.... ah, now I get it. There's no sexuality in it. That maybe one of the reasons for downvoting. I get it.
Seriously: Stop punishing movies for not being hyped. Start reviewing if it works and if it entertains.
TL;DR?
Entertaining, well done movie without lengths, above average in acting, book, atmosphere. Could have been a real blockbuster with a bit more money invested.