Cymbeline is a ruler of a divided Britain. When Innogen, the only living heir, marries her sweetheart in secret, an enraged Cymbeline banishes him. But a powerful figure behind the throne is... Read allCymbeline is a ruler of a divided Britain. When Innogen, the only living heir, marries her sweetheart in secret, an enraged Cymbeline banishes him. But a powerful figure behind the throne is plotting to seize power and murder them both.Cymbeline is a ruler of a divided Britain. When Innogen, the only living heir, marries her sweetheart in secret, an enraged Cymbeline banishes him. But a powerful figure behind the throne is plotting to seize power and murder them both.
Photos
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- ConnectionsVersion of Cymbeline (1937)
Featured review
'Cymbeline' is one of the lesser known Shakespeare plays and that is evident in a very scant available video/DVD competition of film and stage productions. It is a shame, because while it is nowhere near among Shakespeare's best it does deserve to be performed more and it is more down to being difficult to stage, with one of Shakespeare's most complicated (sometimes over-complicated and at times bizarre) plots, rather than the play's quality. Actually think it is one of the better lesser known plays and worth it for some memorable quotes and the final scene.
This 2016 Royal Shakespeare Company production of 'Cymbeline' left me quite conflicted, really did not know what to make of it but concluded when pondering that it was a watchable but frustratingly uneven production. One with a great cast and an improved second half, but not visually attractive, too overdone in the first half and a hodge podge of fairly conceptually intriguing if perplexing ideas done too little with. It is interesting for its numerous reversals of character genders but this 'Cymbeline' is going to be very love or hate. Despite not being perfect, the 1982 BBC Television Shakespeare production was more my cup of tea actually.
What saves 'Cymbeline' (2016) is the cast, with everybody excelling in particularly the second half when the drama is meatier. Bethan Cullinane is deeply touching and resilient as Innogen and the maternal quality Gillian Bevan brought to the title role was interesting and somewhat refreshing while also showing his defiance. The standout of the males was the haunted Posthumous of Hiran Abeysekera, closely followed by Oliver Johnstone's unsettlingly cunning Iachimo. Marcus Griffiths makes a dolt of a character amusing and more layered than what one might think initially. Graham Turner is very good as Belarius and a highlight of the second half.
It's worth sticking with the production in order to see it get much better with the second half. Which did have a lot of emotional impact (much of it very heartfelt), was more coherent and didn't feel as hectic. The characters are also more nuanced from being more intimately focused on them and character relationships more complexly explored. The final scene is beautifully staged and performed. The music is occasionally a little melodramatic but is on the most part wonderful, the orchestration tugging at the heartstrings.
However, this 'Cymbeline' could have been a lot better. It is not the most attractive of productions visually, aside from the beautifully intimate video directing, and that is putting it lightly. The costumes are actually pretty ugly and trying to discern where and when the production was meant to be set was hard. There is very little imagination in the sets which were drab in some places and gaudy in others.
Although the second half is very well done, the first for my tastes was quite chaotic. Too hectic in pace, with the production seeming to mistake manic for enthusiastic, and with an excessive whirlwind of oddly intriguing ideas that are half-baked and truly perplexing at best in the execution and felt like too many undercooked ingredients thrown together into a simmering cauldron. They also don't do anything to make the drama clearer or add much insight, if anything the most perplexing touches confused it. Would go as far to say most add nothing to it and also jars with the text, the more pastoral moments of it not matched by the visuals. Seeing as 'Cymbeline' is already complicated plot-wise that lack of cohesion as a result of the underwhelming execution of those ideas was somewhat alienating.
Overall, found it quite difficult to rate and review this production. 5/10
This 2016 Royal Shakespeare Company production of 'Cymbeline' left me quite conflicted, really did not know what to make of it but concluded when pondering that it was a watchable but frustratingly uneven production. One with a great cast and an improved second half, but not visually attractive, too overdone in the first half and a hodge podge of fairly conceptually intriguing if perplexing ideas done too little with. It is interesting for its numerous reversals of character genders but this 'Cymbeline' is going to be very love or hate. Despite not being perfect, the 1982 BBC Television Shakespeare production was more my cup of tea actually.
What saves 'Cymbeline' (2016) is the cast, with everybody excelling in particularly the second half when the drama is meatier. Bethan Cullinane is deeply touching and resilient as Innogen and the maternal quality Gillian Bevan brought to the title role was interesting and somewhat refreshing while also showing his defiance. The standout of the males was the haunted Posthumous of Hiran Abeysekera, closely followed by Oliver Johnstone's unsettlingly cunning Iachimo. Marcus Griffiths makes a dolt of a character amusing and more layered than what one might think initially. Graham Turner is very good as Belarius and a highlight of the second half.
It's worth sticking with the production in order to see it get much better with the second half. Which did have a lot of emotional impact (much of it very heartfelt), was more coherent and didn't feel as hectic. The characters are also more nuanced from being more intimately focused on them and character relationships more complexly explored. The final scene is beautifully staged and performed. The music is occasionally a little melodramatic but is on the most part wonderful, the orchestration tugging at the heartstrings.
However, this 'Cymbeline' could have been a lot better. It is not the most attractive of productions visually, aside from the beautifully intimate video directing, and that is putting it lightly. The costumes are actually pretty ugly and trying to discern where and when the production was meant to be set was hard. There is very little imagination in the sets which were drab in some places and gaudy in others.
Although the second half is very well done, the first for my tastes was quite chaotic. Too hectic in pace, with the production seeming to mistake manic for enthusiastic, and with an excessive whirlwind of oddly intriguing ideas that are half-baked and truly perplexing at best in the execution and felt like too many undercooked ingredients thrown together into a simmering cauldron. They also don't do anything to make the drama clearer or add much insight, if anything the most perplexing touches confused it. Would go as far to say most add nothing to it and also jars with the text, the more pastoral moments of it not matched by the visuals. Seeing as 'Cymbeline' is already complicated plot-wise that lack of cohesion as a result of the underwhelming execution of those ideas was somewhat alienating.
Overall, found it quite difficult to rate and review this production. 5/10
- TheLittleSongbird
- Feb 4, 2021
- Permalink
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Languages
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime3 hours
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was Royal Shakespeare Company: Cymbeline (2016) officially released in Canada in English?
Answer