- From: Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:20:02 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
On Oct 25, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: >> On Oct 22, 2010, at 4:28 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote: >>> Given that duplicate properties are handled on >>> a last-one-wins basis, repeating the transition-property list itself seems >>> less >>> desirable and more prone to causing unwelcome surprises. >> >> I'm not sure what you mean by "repeating the transition-property list >> itself". > > He means, given CSS like "transition-property: color, > background-color; transition-duration: 1s 2s 3s;", cycling > transition-property to match the length of the duration list, > obtaining a result identical to "transition-property: color, > background-color, color; transition-duration: 1s 2s 3s;". I agree that we should not repeat transition-property. But in your example above I assume you mean to have commas between each time value? ----- ~Chris cmarrin@apple.com
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2010 20:20:35 UTC