[email protected] from July 2005 by date

Sunday, 31 July 2005

• Re: [css3-values] attr() function Laurens Holst
• Re: [css3-values] New WD for Values & Units Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [css3-values] New WD for Values & Units Christoph Päper
• Re: [css3-values] attr() function Ian Hickson
• Re: [css3-values] attr() function Orion Adrian
• Re: [css3-values] attr() function Ian Hickson
• Re: [css3-values] attr() function Orion Adrian
• Re: [css3-values] New WD for Values & Units Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [css21] stacking order on non-replaced, inline boxes Ian Hickson
• Re: [css3-values] calc() function Laurens Holst
• Re: [css21] stacking order on non-replaced, inline boxes Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [css21] stacking order on non-replaced, inline boxes Ian Hickson
• [css21] stacking order on non-replaced, inline boxes Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [css3-values] attr() function Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [css3-values] attr() function David Woolley
• Re: [css3-values] missing units fora@annevankesteren.nl
• [css3-values] calc() function Anne van Kesteren
• [css3-values] attr() function Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [css3-values] missing units Bjoern Hoehrmann
• [css3-values] not specifying type in attr() might cause extension problems Anne van Kesteren
• [css3-values] missing units Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [css3-values] New WD for Values & Units David Woolley

Thursday, 28 July 2005

• RE: CSS3 Thai line breaking Paul Nelson \(TYPOGRAPHY\)

Saturday, 30 July 2005

• Re: [css3-values] New WD for Values & Units Laurens Holst
• Re: Editorial Comment on CSS3 Values and Units (and perhaps other specs) Elliotte Harold
• Re: Editorial Comment on CSS3 Values and Units (and perhaps other specs) Felix Miata
• Re: Editorial Comment on CSS3 Values and Units (and perhaps other specs) Elliotte Harold
• Re: Editorial Comment on CSS3 Values and Units (and perhaps other specs) Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Editorial Comment on CSS3 Values and Units (and perhaps other specs) Elliotte Harold
• Re: Editorial Comment on CSS3 Values and Units (and perhaps other specs) Felix Miata
• Editorial Comment on CSS3 Values and Units (and perhaps other specs) Elliotte Harold

Friday, 29 July 2005

• Re: [css3-values] New WD for Values & Units Christoph Päper
• Re: rows with display:table Allan Sandfeld Jensen
• Re: rows with display:table Manuel Strehl
• Re: rows with display:table Christoph Päper

Thursday, 28 July 2005

• Re: [WF2] Readonly and default pseudoclass matching Ian Hickson
• [css3-values] New WD for Values & Units Bert Bos
• rows with display:table Manuel Strehl
• Re: multimedia-level property Ian Hickson
• Re: [css3-background] Background-attachment and a new suggestion Rob Mientjes

Thursday, 7 July 2005

• multimedia-level property Toni Ruottu

Tuesday, 17 May 2005

• Re: [css3-background] suggestion of alternate method for drawing shadows ben

Thursday, 21 July 2005

• Re: [css3-background] Background-attachment and a new suggestion arcticmac
• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. ben

Friday, 15 July 2005

• Re: New layout language. Leonardo Rojas

Thursday, 21 July 2005

• FW: [selectors] Yet another attempt at trees ben

Tuesday, 26 July 2005

• [WF2] Readonly and default pseudoclass matching Boris Zbarsky

Monday, 25 July 2005

• Re: [CSS21] Nested Counters and Scope Geoff Soutter

Saturday, 23 July 2005

• [css3-mediaqueries] 6.2. width - negative <length> allowed? Anne van Kesteren

Friday, 22 July 2005

• Re: [CSS21] Nested Counters and Scope Allan Sandfeld Jensen
• Re: [CSS21] Nested Counters and Scope L. David Baron
• Re: [CSS21] Nested Counters and Scope Allan Sandfeld Jensen
• Re: [CSS21] Nested Counters and Scope L. David Baron
• [css3-mediaqueries] 6.2. height typo Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [CSS21] Nested Counters and Scope Geoff Soutter

Thursday, 21 July 2005

• Re: [CSS21] access to system values of presentation properties L. David Baron
• Re: [CSS21] as-rendered properties L. David Baron
• [CSS21] as-rendered properties Al Gilman
• [CSS21] access to system values of presentation properties Al Gilman
• Re: [CSS21] Nested Counters and Scope Boris Zbarsky
• [CSS21] Nested Counters and Scope Geoff Soutter
• Re: [CSS21] out of scope counter-reset inconsistency? L. David Baron

Wednesday, 20 July 2005

• [CSS21] out of scope counter-reset inconsistency? Geoff Soutter

Tuesday, 19 July 2005

• FW: [selectors] Yet another attempt at trees Ernest Cline
• Re: [selectors] Yet another attempt at trees Philip TAYLOR
• [selectors] Yet another attempt at trees Ernest Cline
• Re: Hypothetical Syntax of Variables Christoph Päper
• Re: Hypothetical Syntax of Variables David Woolley
• Hypothetical Syntax of Variables Christoph Päper

Monday, 18 July 2005

• [css3-background] Background-attachment and a new suggestion Rob Mientjes

Sunday, 17 July 2005

• Re: [CSS21] font-size of HTML headings Philip TAYLOR
• Re: [CSS21] font-size of HTML headings Felix Miata
• [CSS21] font-size of HTML headings j.j.

Friday, 15 July 2005

• [CSS21] HTML examples should use HTML 4.01 DTD j.j.

Saturday, 16 July 2005

• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. Matthew Raymond

Friday, 15 July 2005

• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML Laurens Holst
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML Al Gilman
• [CSS21] out-of-date references Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML Karl Dubost
• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. Ian Hickson
• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. Laurens Holst
• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. Mikko Rantalainen
• [css3-page] combining pseudo-classes Anne van Kesteren
• [css3-page] initial containing block for the root element Anne van Kesteren
• [CSS21] Question on definition of containing block for abs pos elements Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. Slalomsk8er

Thursday, 14 July 2005

• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. Laurens Holst
• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. Christoph Päper
• Re: [CSS21] HTML 4.0 versus HTML 4.01 Matthew Raymond
• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. Matthew Raymond

Wednesday, 13 July 2005

• [CSS21] Chapter 4: Syntax - comments Christian Roth
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML Ian Hickson
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [CSS21] Editorial - Image doesn't display Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML Ineke van der Maat
• Re: Backwards and Forwards Compatability Orion Adrian
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML Allan Sandfeld Jensen
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML Laurens Holst
• [CSS21] General comment Karl Dubost
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML Karl Dubost
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML Karl Dubost
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML Laurens Holst
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML Ian Hickson
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML Karl Dubost
• [CSS21] Editorial - typo, missing space Karl Dubost
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML Ian Hickson
• [CSS21] Editorial - Image doesn't display Karl Dubost
• [CSS21] HTML 4.0 versus HTML 4.01 Karl Dubost
• [CSS21] Unicode and conforming User Agent Karl Dubost
• [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML Karl Dubost
• Re: [CSS21] Editorial - Layout of Good/Bad example Laurens Holst
• Re: [CSS21] Editorial - Layout of Good/Bad example Karl Dubost
• Re: [CSS21] Editorial - Layout of Good/Bad example L. David Baron
• [CSS21] Editorial - Layout of Good/Bad example Karl Dubost
• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. Laurens Holst
• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. Matthew Raymond
• Re: Backwards and Forwards Compatability Laurens Holst
• Re: Backwards and Forwards Compatability Orion Adrian
• Re: Server and Client Capabilities (Where Info. Should Be Located) Laurens Holst
• Re: Server and Client Capabilities (Where Info. Should Be Located) Orion Adrian
• Re: Backwards and Forwards Compatability Laurens Holst
• Re: Backwards and Forwards Compatability Orion Adrian
• Re: Server and Client Capabilities (Where Info. Should Be Located) Laurens Holst
• Re: Backwards and Forwards Compatability Laurens Holst
• Server and Client Capabilities (Where Info. Should Be Located) Orion Adrian
• Re: Fwd: several messages from Orion Adrian Ian Hickson
• Re: Fwd: several messages from Orion Adrian Orion Adrian
• Re: Fwd: several messages from Orion Adrian Boris Zbarsky
• Backwards and Forwards Compatability Orion Adrian
• Fwd: several messages from Orion Adrian Orion Adrian

Tuesday, 12 July 2005

• Re: The process of the CSS WG (was: Is There a Problem?) Ian Hickson
• Re: [CSS2.1] Replaced elements L. David Baron
• Re: several messages from Orion Adrian Ian Hickson
• RE: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Ian Hickson

Monday, 11 July 2005

• The www-style CSS FAQ update. Laurens Holst
• Re: [CSS21] Versioning of CSS Laurens Holst
• Re: [CSS21] Versioning of CSS Orion Adrian
• Re: [CSS21] Versioning of CSS Bert Bos
• [CSS21] Fixed Table Layout - Columns Lachlan Hunt

Saturday, 9 July 2005

• Re: Dimensions better than unitless numbers for future CSS specs Laurens Holst
• Re: Dimensions better than unitless numbers for future CSS specs Etan Wexler
• Re: New layout language. Laurens Holst

Friday, 8 July 2005

• Re: New layout language. Christoph Päper
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: [CSS21] Versioning of CSS Ben Ward
• Re: New layout language. Laurens Holst
• [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. Christoph Päper
• Re: [CSS21] Versioning of CSS Christoph Päper
• Re: New layout language. Christoph Päper

Thursday, 7 July 2005

• Re: New layout language. Christoph Päper
• Re: New layout language. Christoph Päper
• Re: New layout language. Kris@meridian-ds.com
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• [CSS21] typo: illegal characters Karl Dubost
• [CSS21] Proof of CSS 2.1 / CSS 2.0 Karl Dubost
• [CSS21] Versioning of CSS Karl Dubost
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: Allow Support for Multiple External Style Sheets with Limited Scope Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: Allow Support for Multiple External Style Sheets with Limited Scope Jens Meiert
• [CSS21] Test suite for "Features at risk"? Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: New layout language. Laurens Holst
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Philip TAYLOR
• Re: New layout language. Kris@meridian-ds.com
• Re: New layout language. Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Lachlan Hunt
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application Laurens Holst
• Re: Dimensions better than unitless numbers for future CSS specs Laurens Holst

Wednesday, 6 July 2005

• Re: Dimensions better than unitless numbers for future CSS specs fantasai

Thursday, 7 July 2005

• [css3] @page nested inside @media fora@annevankesteren.nl
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application David Woolley
• Dimensions better than unitless numbers for future CSS specs Etan Wexler
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS Etan Wexler
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS Christoph Päper
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Christoph Päper
• Re: Unitless dimensions Christoph Päper
• Fixes To Positioning Model (was: New Layout Language) Kelly Miller
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian

Wednesday, 6 July 2005

• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. David Woolley
• Re: New layout language. David Woolley
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application David Woolley
• Re: New layout language. Kris@meridian-ds.com
• Re: New layout language. Laurens Holst
• Re: New layout language. Laurens Holst
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• RE: New layout language. Mark Moore
• Re: New layout language. Kris@meridian-ds.com
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Laurens Holst
• Re: New layout language. Kelly Miller
• Re: New layout language. Laurens Holst
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Laurens Holst
• Re: New layout language. Kelly Miller
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Kris@meridian-ds.com
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application Orion Adrian
• Re: Primer for layout/formatting split. Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: Is There a Problem? Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Kris@meridian-ds.com
• Re: New layout language. Laurens Holst
• Re: New layout language. Laurens Holst
• The process of the CSS WG (was: Is There a Problem?) Laurens Holst
• Re: New layout language. Kris@meridian-ds.com
• Re: New layout language. Matthew Raymond
• Re: New layout language. Laurens Holst
• Re: New layout language. Kris@meridian-ds.com
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS Laurens Holst
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: Is There a Problem? Lachlan Hunt
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS David Woolley
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian

Tuesday, 5 July 2005

• Re: New layout language. Kris@meridian-ds.com
• Re: Unitless dimensions Laurens Holst
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS P.Taylor
• Re: New layout language. David Woolley
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application David Woolley
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS David Woolley
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Kris@meridian-ds.com
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Kris@meridian-ds.com
• Re: New layout language. Kris@meridian-ds.com
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: Unitless dimensions P.Taylor
• Re: Unitless dimensions Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: Unitless dimensions Bert Bos
• Re: Unitless dimensions Felix Miata
• Re: New layout language. Kris@meridian-ds.com
• Re: Unitless dimensions Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Unitless dimensions Robin Berjon
• Unitless dimensions Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Is There a Problem? (was: The Progress of CSS) Orion Adrian
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Kris@meridian-ds.com
• Re: Is There a Problem? (was: The Progress of CSS) Ian Hickson
• Re: Is There a Problem? (was: The Progress of CSS) Orion Adrian
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS Laurens Holst
• Re: Primer for layout/formatting split. Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Lachlan Hunt
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application Orion Adrian
• RE: Is There a Problem? (was: The Progress of CSS) Ian Hickson
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Orion Adrian
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS Orion Adrian
• Re: Why aren't styled language repsonsible for pseudo-classes? Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Lachlan Hunt
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS Philip TAYLOR
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS Laurens Holst
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Mikko Rantalainen
• RE: Is There a Problem? (was: The Progress of CSS) Mark Birbeck
• Re: Why aren't styled language repsonsible for pseudo-classes? Laurens Holst
• RE: Why aren't styled language repsonsible for pseudo-classes? Mark Birbeck
• Re: Primer for layout/formatting split. David Woolley
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application David Woolley
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: New layout language. Kris@meridian-ds.com
• New layout language. Orion Adrian
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application Orion Adrian
• Primer for layout/formatting split. Orion Adrian

Monday, 4 July 2005

• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) David Woolley
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application David Woolley
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Laurens Holst
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Laurens Holst
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Orion Adrian
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application Laurens Holst
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Laurens Holst
• Why aren't styled language repsonsible for pseudo-classes? Orion Adrian
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment Laurens Holst
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Ian Hickson
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Ian Hickson
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Laurens Holst
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Emrah BASKAYA
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Laurens Holst
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class David Woolley
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Brian Sexton
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Andrew Fedoniouk

Sunday, 3 July 2005

• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Laurens Holst
• Re: The Progress of CSS Orion Adrian
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Orion Adrian
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Orion Adrian
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: The Progress of CSS David Woolley
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) David Woolley
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class David Woolley
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) David Woolley
• Re: The Progress of CSS David Woolley
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Orion Adrian
• Re: The Progress of CSS Orion Adrian
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Ryan Cannon
• Re: The Progress of CSS Christopher Aillon
• RE: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Mark Moore
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Orion Adrian
• Re: The Progress of CSS Orion Adrian
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Orion Adrian

Friday, 1 July 2005

• Re: The Progress of CSS Christopher Aillon

Saturday, 2 July 2005

• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Ian Hickson
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Ian Hickson
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class David Woolley
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Ian Hickson
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Orion Adrian
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Ian Hickson
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Ian Hickson
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Orion Adrian
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. David Woolley
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application David Woolley
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment Ian Hickson
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment Ian Hickson
• Re: Is There a Problem? Ian Hickson
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Ian Hickson
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class L. David Baron
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Is There a Problem? Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Orion Adrian
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Ian Hickson
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. Ian Hickson
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Martijn
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class Lachlan Hunt
• [CSS21] Border Conflict Resolution Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. Lachlan Hunt
• Proposal: :column pseudo-class Laurens Holst
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. Laurens Holst
• Re: Is There a Problem? Laurens Holst
• RE: Is There a Problem? (was: The Progress of CSS) Ian Hickson
• RE: Is There a Problem? (was: The Progress of CSS) Mark Birbeck
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. Lachlan Hunt
• Meth fund: another way forward for CSS Etan Wexler
• Re: The Progress of CSS Etan Wexler
• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Is There a Problem? (was: The Progress of CSS) Ian Hickson
• Is There a Problem? (was: The Progress of CSS) Mark Moore

Friday, 1 July 2005

• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application Orion Adrian

Saturday, 2 July 2005

• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Ian Hickson
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment Ian Hickson
• Clip will be more useful with percentages Emrah BASKAYA
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: The Progress of CSS Ian Hickson

Friday, 1 July 2005

• Re: The Progress of CSS fantasai

Saturday, 2 July 2005

• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. Ian Hickson
• Re: [CSS3UI] x/y cursor hotspot values Ian Hickson
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment Ian Hickson
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Fwd: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. Boris Zbarsky

Friday, 1 July 2005

• Re: The Progress of CSS Ian Hickson
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application Kris@meridian-ds.com
• Re: The Progress of CSS Etan Wexler
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. Orion Adrian
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. David Woolley
• Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows Orion Adrian
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Orion Adrian
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application David Woolley
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) David Woolley
• Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows David Woolley
• Re: The Progress of CSS Adam Kuehn
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application Orion Adrian
• CSS design goal, was: Re: The Progress of CSS Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: The Progress of CSS Kris@meridian-ds.com
• Re: The Progress of CSS Adam Kuehn
• Re: The Progress of CSS Orion Adrian
• Re: The Progress of CSS Kris@meridian-ds.com
• The Progress of CSS Adam Kuehn
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application Kris@meridian-ds.com
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id Ian Hickson
• Re: [CSS3 Text] Reference to JIS X 4051 Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows Emrah BASKAYA
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id Norman Walsh
• The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application Orion Adrian
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id Ian Hickson
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id Chris Lilley
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Orion Adrian
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Laurens Holst
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Kris@meridian-ds.com
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Laurens Holst
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS Orion Adrian
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Laurens Holst
• Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows Lachlan Hunt
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Kris@meridian-ds.com
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Orion Adrian
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id Orion Adrian
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Orion Adrian
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS Laurens Holst
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id Norman Walsh
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Laurens Holst
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Laurens Holst
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Lachlan Hunt
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Orion Adrian
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS Orion Adrian
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Håkon Wium Lie
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Orion Adrian
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS Laurens Holst
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Jan Brasna
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Laurens Holst
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Jan Brasna
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Jan Brasna
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Kris@meridian-ds.com
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Laurens Holst
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS Orion Adrian
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Orion Adrian
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. Orion Adrian
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Philip TAYLOR
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Orion Adrian
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Orion Adrian
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Orion Adrian
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS Laurens Holst
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS Laurens Holst
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Philip TAYLOR
• Re: acid2 Philip TAYLOR
• Re: acid2 Håkon Wium Lie
• Re: acid2 Philip TAYLOR
• acid2 Håkon Wium Lie

Thursday, 30 June 2005

• Re: [CSS3 Text] 2 Editorial Notes + Hyphenation Files fantasai
• Re: [CSS3 Text] Reference to JIS X 4051 fantasai

Friday, 1 July 2005

• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) David Woolley
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. David Woolley
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Kelly Miller
• Re: CSS ID, xml:id confusion Ian Hickson
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Ian Hickson
• Re: CSS ID, xml:id confusion Ryan Cannon
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id Ian Hickson
• Re: CSS ID, xml:id confusion Orion Adrian
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id Ian Hickson
• Re: CSS ID, xml:id confusion Ian Hickson
• CSS ID, xml:id confusion Orion Adrian
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Orion Adrian
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Orion Adrian
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. Orion Adrian

Thursday, 30 June 2005

• RE: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) Peter Williams

Last message date: Sunday, 31 July 2005 21:18:02 UTC