Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Assessment

Working Groups at WikiProject History:

Assessment · Collaboration · Review · Outreach · Task forces

The History Assessment Department

Working Groups at WikiProject History:

Assessment · Collaboration · Review · Outreach · Task forces

WikiProject History

Project navigation

.

Review

.

Assessment

.

Portals

.

Notable areas

.

Showcase

.

Participants

Current active members:

Please feel free to add your name to join!!!!

Quality statistics

History articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
Quality	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	Other	???	Total
FA	6	14	25	39		264	2	350
FL		3	5	5		4	1	18
A			2	6		19	1	28
GA	10	36	95	169	1	719	43	1,073
B	64	230	306	805		1,943	421	3,769
C	100	309	602	2,149		3,875	959	7,994
Start	31	188	573	4,288	1	10,518	2,176	17,775
Stub	1	32	154	3,063	1	6,066	2,100	11,417
List	6	72	201	7,278	10	1,476	442	9,485
Category		4	2		28,852	4,502		33,360
Disambig				1	61	30		92
File					47	39		86
Portal					8,360	11		8,371
Project					65	13		78
Redirect		25	69	158	1,260	287		1,799
Template		1	3	2	1,206	151		1,363
NA					16	405	1	422
Other					672			672
Assessed	218	914	2,037	17,963	40,552	30,322	6,146	98,152
Unassessed			1	11		14	435	461
Total	218	914	2,038	17,974	40,552	30,336	6,581	98,613
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 202,868			Ω = 4.78

Notes

Please feel free to leave any notes at all in this section, regarding articles to be assessed, items to discuss, tasks to be done, or anything else.

please add your signature to any items that you add or any other text that you add on this page. that makes it much easier for active members of this project to help each other, to work on common projects and to assist each other. thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 15:49, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tasks, items, notes, comments or questions

~~Kevin M. Kruse - The article is currently ranked Stub-class, I expanded it a bit. Could it be reassessed? Isi96 (talk) 04:16, 6 June 2021 (UTC)~~[reply]
- Has been assessed as C-class since. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:29, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Talkata - An interesting Algerian tribe still unassessed could i ask for an assessment please. ⵟⵓⵔⴽⵉⵙⵀⴽⴰⴱⵢⵍ (talk) 18:35, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Popular pages

There is a list of list of popular pages, ordered by number of views, a bot-generated list of pageviews, useful for focused cleanup of frequently viewed articles.

Template

History Unassessed

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This template is used on many pages and changes may be widely noticed. Test changes in the template's /sandbox or /testcases subpages, or in your own user subpage. Consider discussing changes on the talk page before implementing them.

Shortcuts

Usage

The following is the full syntax used for placing this template on a talk page:

{{WikiProject History
|class=
|importance=
|attention=
|auto=
|needs-infobox=
|Contemporary History=
|Contemporary history-importance=
}}

Parameters

class – a rating of the article's quality; see the quality scale for more details.
importance – a rating of the article's quality; see the importance scale for more details.
attention – "yes" if the article is extremely low quality and requires the attention of experienced editors.
auto – used by bots if the article has been assessed automatically
needs-infobox – "yes" if the article requires an infobox
Contemporary History – "yes" if the Contemporary History task force applies
- Contemporary history-importance – see "importance" parameter above

Quality scale

Featured articles

Reserved for articles that meet the featured article criteria and have received featured article status after community review

Featured articles are selected at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates

A-Class

Reserved for articles that have received A-Class status after review by the project. Such articles are expected to largely meet the featured article criteria, and must be comprehensive, accurate, well-sourced, and decently-written.

A-Class articles are selected by the project at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Review#A-Class Review.

Good articles

Reserved for articles that meet the good article criteria and have received good article status.

Good articles are selected at Wikipedia:Good article nominations.

B-Class

The article meets the following six criteria:

It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited.
It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies.
It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content.
It is free from major grammatical errors.
It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams.
It is written from a neutral point of view

Start Class

Start class article have a few paragraphs that provide all the key points but may not cover all aspects of the subject. These articles usually have an image or infobox to support the text.

Start-class articles are selected by individual assessors.

Stub Class

Stubs are very short articles which offer a quick description of the subject

Stub articles are selected by individual assessors

Assessment data

Importance scale

Need	The article's priority or importance, regardless of its quality
Top	Subject is a must-have for a good encyclopedia
High	Subject contributes a depth of knowledge
Mid	Subject fills in more minor details
Low	Subject is mainly of specialist interest.

Statistics

History article rating and assessment scheme
(NB: Listing, Log & Stats are updated on a daily basis by a bot)

Daily log of status changes

Current Statistics

History articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
Quality	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	Other	???	Total
FA	6	14	25	39		264	2	350
FL		3	5	5		4	1	18
A			2	6		19	1	28
GA	10	36	95	169	1	719	43	1,073
B	64	230	306	805		1,943	421	3,769
C	100	309	602	2,149		3,875	959	7,994
Start	31	188	573	4,288	1	10,518	2,176	17,775
Stub	1	32	154	3,063	1	6,066	2,100	11,417
List	6	72	201	7,278	10	1,476	442	9,485
Category		4	2		28,852	4,502		33,360
Disambig				1	61	30		92
File					47	39		86
Portal					8,360	11		8,371
Project					65	13		78
Redirect		25	69	158	1,260	287		1,799
Template		1	3	2	1,206	151		1,363
NA					16	405	1	422
Other					672			672
Assessed	218	914	2,037	17,963	40,552	30,322	6,146	98,152
Unassessed			1	11		14	435	461
Total	218	914	2,038	17,974	40,552	30,336	6,581	98,613
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 202,868			Ω = 4.78

list of all subpages

In this wikipediaspace:

Wikipedia:

WikiProject History/Assessment

Wikipedia talk: