Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yamaha YM3012

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yamaha YM3012 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm nominating a series of chips manufactured by the Yamaha Corporation. These articles fail to show the notability of these products; they're all low-level components that have been used in commercial products. While those products may be notable, these components are not and their usage does not confer notability. While some references can be found, that information and documentation is for the use of engineers; and technical documentation does not represent notability. The parts are not innovative or revolutionary in any lasting way.

Yamaha YM3014B (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Yamaha YM3016 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Mikeblas (talk) 17:01, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Concur with nom as non-notable topics failing WP:GNG with no independent sourcing. I see spec and data sheets and such, but nothing that discusses them in any meaningful way for individual encyclopedic article content. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 23:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:39, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 01:09, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.