Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Shuttle
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:55, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Star Shuttle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This bus company does not meet WP:NCORP. It's great that their fleet of buses has adequate luggage space, but there aren't any reliable third party references with non-tirival coverage about this small company. Mikeblas (talk) 20:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 20:14, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as searches have found nothing noticeably better and there's nothing to suggest anything else convincing. SwisterTwister talk 05:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as lacking independent sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.