Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Sumner
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Knots Landing. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:52, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- Greg Sumner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable secondary character on television soap opera. Non-trivial references are not forthcoming; provided references are from a self-published fan site. Wikipedia isn't a catalog, or a fan-site. Mikeblas (talk) 01:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Redirect(see below; redid my !vote Lourdes 08:46, 2 December 2017 (UTC)) to Knots Landing The character was well-known, although I'll accept that I have not been able to find sources that may justify topic notability. Lourdes 11:38, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:59, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:59, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Merge to Knots Landing or perhaps a characters article with other currently-standalone articles, per WP:ATD-M. Jclemens (talk) 08:29, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Merge sounds sensible, per Jclemens statement above. Lourdes 08:46, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.