Talk:July–September 2016 UK Independence Party leadership election

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

"Background" section

I have deleted the "Background" section of the page as it appeared to contain information which is not relevant to the 2016 Leadership election, and does not appear to belong to this page. Tomaz.slivnik (talk) 20:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you not rip out references that are used more than once - please move them to the next time the note is used. Timrollpickering (talk) 22:44, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Endorsements

When listing endorsements on Wikipedia articles -- see e.g. List of endorsements in the Scottish independence referendum, 2014, Endorsements_in_the_United_Kingdom_European_Union_membership_referendum,_2016 or Jeb_Bush_presidential_campaign,_2016#Endorsements -- we only list notable endorsements. As a rule of thumb, notability is determined by whether the person/organisation is considered notable enough to warrant a Wikipedia article of their own. That's why I have trimmed the endorsements list here of various local councillors and regional chairs who are not in themselves notable. Compare also Labour_Party_(UK)_leadership_election,_2016#Endorsements and Conservative_Party_(UK)_leadership_election,_2016#Endorsements: councillors or regional chairs don't get listed.

Another perspective on this is to go back to the basic pillars of Wikipeda: WP:V and WP:RS. While an official social media outlet can be referenced, we would like reliable and independent sources for material. Bondegezou (talk) 09:25, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article on the green Party Leadership is relevant to the issues discussed here.

Bondegezou would you care to comment on whether you are a member of a political party , and have you ever stood for election for any political party WP:COI. [1] would it be proper to edit on relevant party matters and further to participate in the article of a rival party if you had indeed sought public office for and are a current or former member of a rival political party? Please draw any potential conflict of interest to the appropriate authorities. I am happy to leave this question here, thank you. 06:44, 19 August 2016 (UTC)RogerGLewis (talk)

I am a member of the Liberal Democrats and have in the past stood for election at a local level, although I never came close to winning. Bondegezou (talk) 06:53, 19 August 2016 (UTC) ^[1]RogerGLewis (talk) 09:53, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above is spillover from Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:RogerGLewis_editwarring_against_consensus.2C_possible_COI and is discussed there. As per WP:COIPOLITICAL, I see no conflict of interest in my edits to this article, but I have left the COI tag RogerGLewis has added while the matter is being resolved. Bondegezou (talk) 09:56, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Green_Party_of_England_and_Wales_leadership_election,_2016

Infobox layout

Is it possible to make the infobox have two candidates on each row, rather than 3 on one and 1 on the other as it currently is? Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 09:57, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I tried to do this, but couldn't work out how! Bondegezou (talk) 09:58, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Antanas Guoga

Can we keep Antanas Guoga out of the list of candidates? His supposed candidacy was a publicity stunt. He is not and never has been a member of UKIP and his views are diametrically opposite to those of UKIP. He was clearly never eligible, clearly never serious. While his stunt got media attention -- as is the point of a publicity stunt -- no media report of the election ever included him in a list of candidates or potential candidates. He should not be in a list next to Douglas Carswell or Suzanne Evans or Steven Woolfe. It is not Wikipedia's job to promote publicity stunts. It adds nothing to the readers understanding of the election to list his name. Bondegezou (talk) 01:35, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Brucejoel99, might I ask you explain your reasoning here for including Guoga? He clearly was not a real candidate. He was clearly ineligible from the start and his "application" was a publicity stunt to criticize UKIP. His own press releases fails WP:RS. Media coverage never treated him as a real candidate. It is a nonsense to include him in a list with actual UKIP politicians. Everyone else: comments please! I'll try a compromise edit in the mean time. Bondegezou (talk) 19:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I note the only independent citation given about Guoga explicitly describes his action as a "publicity stunt". As per WP:DUE, we shouldn't be covering someone's publicity stunt that got minimal WP:RS attention. Bondegezou (talk) 19:19, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fine, I will concede it as a publicity stunt candidacy. Sorry to waste time. Brucejoel99 (talk) 19:45, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Arnott

Would someone be able to help edit the fact that Jonathan Arnott has stepped down from the Ukip leadership race and will no longer be standing, he made an official announcement on his website here http://www.jonathanarnott.co.uk/2016/08/statement-on-the-ukip-leadership-election/

(Z2a (talk) 09:48, 15 August 2016 (UTC))[reply]

One article to unite them all

Why don't we have one article entitled UK Independence Party leadership elections, 2016 rather than an article for each election (presuming a second election does go ahead)? It's going to be much the same people involved, it's all part of the same narrative. Bondegezou (talk) 00:06, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Election results alone make little sense. Rather than two pages of elections, let's have one with the whole post-Brexit process. Kahlores (talk) 09:57, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 October 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Unopposed; no minimum participation required. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 03:33, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

– as per July–September 2022 Conservative Party (UK) leadership election - I beg to move the motion!82.41.12.175 (talk) 21:31, 29 October 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 13:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: no participation. relist for a longer discussion period. – robertsky (talk) 13:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

[1] ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Green_Party_of_England_and_Wales_leadership_election,_2016

[1]