Talk:Rising Force
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]"Often considered the most important instrumental rock album in history" - I wouldn't go as far as to say this.
No, me either! How it is ONE of them. Others being Hendrix and Van Halen 1 etc.
Did either Hendrix or Van Halen release instrumental albums? Van Halen's first album is definetly not instrumental. Besides,it says,"is considered",not that it would be.
Fair use rationale for Image:YngwieJMalmsteen-RisingForce.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:YngwieJMalmsteen-RisingForce.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Slight clean up
[edit]I removed some redundant information from the table and gave the article a little once over, as well as adding a few bits of info. If you disagree with me on the aesthetics of the page, then feel free to change it back. ArdClose (talk) 17:37, 7 February 2009 (UTC)