Talk:Karnaphuli

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Rivers Mid‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article needs a map.

Bangladesh High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article falls into the work area of the Geography workgroup of WikiProject Bangladesh

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Copyvio deleted from article

(It was originally moved here but I am now deleting it as copy vio.) Material deleted from article was copyvio from this site:[1]. Material needs to be reworded and not copied from the source. Sincerely, Mattisse 14:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on Karnaphuli River

Cyberbot II has detected links on Karnaphuli River which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://social.yourstory.com/2015/07/ganga-river-dolphin/
Triggered by \byourstory\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:32, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge. Chhandama (talk) 02:55, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't the Khawthlangtuipui River and Karnaphuli River the same river, the name being different on the Indian and Bangladeshi sides of the border? In such situations, doesn't Wikipedia normally have just a single article (like in the case of the Danube, for instance)? I propose that Khawthlangtuipui River be merged into Karnaphuli River. I think that a merged article will convey a more complete picture of the river, without becoming unwieldy in size. Worldbruce (talk) 06:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support: I support the merger of Khawthlangtuipui River into Karnaphuli River --Ragib (talk) 21:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not agrred. Because the bangladeshi part do not known as Khawthlangtuipui River and Indian part as Karnaphuli River like Ganga and padma the same river with two different name in two borders. ferdous ^TM 14:15, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Different name would result in dispute over which name to use.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 08:14, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support: A single river should really have only one article. Possible disputes should not be a factor in the decision...Jokulhlaup (talk) 08:36, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.