Talk:Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Diastolic heart failure page were merged into Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction on 12 March 2018. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
note
[edit]Language used to describe Heart Failure in medical writing, laboratory parameters, clinical studies, journals and imaging formulas is necessarily concise. HFpEF is perhaps the most accurate representation of diastolic heart failure yet devised. Conceptually it appears this formula is half mathematics and half physiology. As a contribution to encyclopedic documentation it should probably be first approved as an authentic medical term by the US Library of Congress Medicine. If approved the mathematical models that would follow are promising.
Merger proposal
[edit]This page covers the same topic as diastolic heart failure, and I believe both are synonyms for the same condition --Ben Best:Talk 21:10, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
I think it would be best to merge HFpEF and diastolic HF as diastolic HF is a largely dated term, however it might make sense to make a new page on diastolic dysfunction as many individuals suffer from diastolic dysfunction that never develops into heart failure. Corduroy pillows making headlines (talk) 17:51, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
NEJM
[edit]Review doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1511175 JFW | T@lk 08:52, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, incorporating this into the article. Anyone know why it's not PubMed indexed? Not enough time? 152.131.10.71 (talk) 19:25, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- It has pubmed ID:27959663.[1]
References
- ^ Redfield, MM (10 November 2016). "Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction". The New England journal of medicine. 375 (19): 1868–1877. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1511175. PMID 27959663.
Proposal for additional information from Medscape to be added to the Wikipedia article
[edit]From Medscape Education Cardiology. CPD. "Heart Failure With Preserved EF: What Do We Mean by Patient Heterogeneity?" Author: Sanjiv J. Shah, MD, FAHA, FACC, FASE. Director, T1 Center for Cardiovascular THerapeutics, Northwestern HpEF Program, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. CPD Released: 6/12/2019. Valid for credit through: 6/12/2020. An outstanding online course on the cutting edge of HFpEF. Way beyond what is covered in the current Wikipedia article. If you think add value please add, if not, delete. Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). https://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/913575?src=wnl_tpal_190613_mscpedu&uac=316323DK&impID=1993783. 3 August 2019.
Proposal for additional information from Medscape to be added to the Wikipedia article
[edit]From Medscape Education Cardiology. CPD. Why and How Should We Be Treating Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction." Authors: Biykem Bozkurt, MD, PhD, FACC, FHFSA, FAHA. Vice-Chair of Medicine, Baylor Colleg of Medicine, Houston, TX. Barry Borlaug, MD, Professor of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. CPD Released: 6/5/2019. Valid for credit through: 6/5/2020. An outstanding online course on the cutting edge of HFpEF. Way beyond what is covered in the current Wikipedia article. If you think add value please add, if not, delete. Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). https://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/913488?src=wnl_tpal_190606_mscpedu&uac=316323DK&impID=1986495. 3 August 2019
Contradictory Information
[edit]Under the diastolic dysfunction header the following statements appear to contradict:
"Diastolic failure is characterized by an elevated diastolic pressure in the left ventricle, despite an essentially normal/physiologic end diastolic volume (EDV)."
"In diastolic heart failure, the volume of blood contained in the ventricles during diastole is lower than it should be, and the pressure of the blood within the chambers is elevated."
I propose that the statements on end diastolic volume and diastolic dysfunction be changed to something along the lines of: "Diastolic failure is characterized by an elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure (EDP) despite a normal EDV at rest. The elevated resting EDP results in an impaired ability to elevate EDV upon exertion, thus reducing cardiac output."
This explanation is in-line with figure 5 of this 2011 review.
Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AW20072000 (talk • contribs) 19:55, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Definition of ejection fraction
[edit]I am a patient diagnosed with HFpEF, not a medical professional. The definition of ejection fraction provided in this article: “the percentage of the volume of blood ejected from the left ventricle with each heartbeat divided by the volume of blood when the left ventricle is maximally filled” appears to be grammatically incorrect.
As the Wikipedia article on ejection fraction explains, ejection fraction is a percentage, measured by dividing one volume by another volume. This article appears to describe ejection fraction as a percentage divided by a volume. This is surely incorrect and confusing if not misleading.
Perhaps it could be better described as: "the volume of blood ejected from the left ventricle with each heartbeat divided by the volume of blood when the left ventricle is maximally filled, expressed as a percentage”. 94.105.118.252 (talk) 04:25, 29 December 2023 (UTC)