Talk:Chambord (liqueur)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chambord (liqueur) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement
[edit]I added the advertisement template tag. I think it's pretty self-evident. Note the "all natural ingredients", "rich flavor", and specification of "madagascar vanilla [and] moroccan citrus peel". -Indalcecio (talk) 07:45, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
- It's been removed, but I agree the article reads like PR. It also implies that the product has been around for centuries, while I suspect it was invented in the last decade to exploit style obsessed idiots. There's no info about the actual history of this product. --Ef80 (talk) 23:33, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- It's a little older than that, est. 1981–82, though not nearly as old as it pretends. From Chambord Online, "The rich heritage of Chambord can be traced to 17th century France. It was then, according to legend, that Louis XIV visited Château de Chambord ..." — Robert Greer (talk) 03:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chambord Liqueur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140326025901/http://www.brown-forman.com:80/news/releases/release.aspx?rid=174 to http://www.brown-forman.com/news/releases/release.aspx?rid=174
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chambord Liqueur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.brown-forman.com/news/releases/release.aspx?rid=174
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130131014738/http://www.packagingdigest.com/article/509771-Packaging_concepts_Chambord_Liqueur_rebrands_with_new_packaging_and_flavoured_vodka_line.php to http://www.packagingdigest.com/article/509771-Packaging_concepts_Chambord_Liqueur_rebrands_with_new_packaging_and_flavoured_vodka_line.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:41, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
The original Chambord bottle released in 1982 was an almost exact copy of that used by Charles Jacquin of Philadelphia for their Forbidden Fruit liqueur.
[edit]The original Chambord bottle released in 1982 was an almost exact copy of that used by Charles Jacquin of Philadelphia for their Forbidden Fruit liqueur. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.100.178.111 (talk) 14:29, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- Well that's hardly surprising - it's the same company (Jacquin et Cie) which made both. It should be mentioned here though. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:35, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 19 December 2018
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 15:10, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Chambord Liqueur → Chambord (liqueur) – Chambord is not known by the proper name "Chambord Liqueur" (see the brand website) and the upper-case L is not required per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization). (Note—although not that relevant—there was a similar RM from a previous page name in 2010 at Talk:Chambord Liqueur/Archive 1#Requested move). Note also page titles of Chartreuse (liqueur) and Galliano (liqueur). (Cocktail, anyone?) Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:23, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support Andy Dingley (talk) 10:46, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:12, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Blackberry or black raspberry?
[edit]The text says it’s made from red and black raspberries, then later from raspberries and blackberries. Blackberries and black raspberries are two different fruits. 2601:642:4C07:4048:61F9:FA30:360E:C2C9 (talk) 03:24, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
- Start-Class Food and drink articles
- Low-importance Food and drink articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- Start-Class France articles
- Low-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages
- Start-Class Spirits articles
- Low-importance Spirits articles
- WikiProject Spirits articles
- Start-Class Brands articles
- Low-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles