Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case
Requests for arbitration
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
| Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Both articles Afro Tech + Afro - prolonged edit disputes & Constant block motions against me | Motions | 17 November 2023 | 0/1/0 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Currently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.
| Motion name | Date posted |
|---|---|
| Arbitrator workflow motions | 1 December 2024 |
About this page Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.
Guidance on participation and word limits Unlike many venues on Wikipedia, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
General guidance
|
Both articles Afro Tech + Afro - prolonged edit disputes & Constant block motions against me
Initiated by ToosieJoosie (talk) at 23:36, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Proposed parties
- ToosieJoosie (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- Solidest (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Afro_Tech
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ToosieJoosie#Following_WP:MOS,_reading_infobox_documentation,_posting_false_sources
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Daniel_Case#Afro_Tech_semiprotection
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Afro_house
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse#Advice/_Assistance_Request
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Third_opinion&oldid=1185425703
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:ToosieJoosie
Statement by ToosieJoosie
As much as I understand that WP:ETN includes feedback I absolutely loathe the sarcastic edit summaries. I feel as though I am constantly being WP:FOLLOWING (ed) as well as being baited into WP:EDITWAR's daily so that I can be motioned inot getting blocked via ANI thread daily, even when I am not editing on the specific articles. Constructive critism I have built a thick skin towards and become more acceptingopposed to have been 'as sensitive in the first few days of using my account and making edits, however the prolonged content disputes/ edit wars as well as "constant threats" and motions for me to be blocked has become highly stressful as well as demotivating to say, the least. off topic: I also recently experienced an edit in my edit history I did not recognize (didn't recall doing myself/ couldn't explain) - not accusing anyone specifically here but to highlight ontop of the "stress" and unfortunate unenjoyable edit experience I am currently facing. Please assist and/or advise further regarding the content disputes as well as whether I face being blocked/ warnings etc.
- Apologies
- By multiple editors specifically regarding the above mentioned articles' summaries
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ToosieJoosie&oldid=1184810542 " you probably don't have any experience (I am a newcomer) , "false sources" etc. (not an edit summary however on my talk page instead of having initiated at the article's talk page)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Afro_house&oldid=1185435871
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Afro_Tech&oldid=1185618410 (after having re-opened the thread at ANI for me to be blocked)
- Special:Contributions/2001:1970:5E26:5A00:7DFE:FFF8:E754:89AE
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Afro_Tech&oldid=1184899343
- ToosieJoosie (talk) 00:08, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- The ANI thread is mainly to have me blocked and it's literally (one) myself , "against" many. I would like to know if all of that/ this ( as per mentioned above) would result / warrant in me being blocked as a content dispute/ edit war? ToosieJoosie (talk) 00:12, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Statement by Solidest
Statement by AirshipJungleman29
I began interacting with ToosieJoosie at Afro Tech and its talk page, after seeing the ANI thread on 13 November. My two comments at the ANI thread were made today (17 November) and explain my thoughts. I do not see the need for an ArbCom case, I'll be honest. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Statement by {Non-party}
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
Both articles Afro Tech + Afro - prolonged edit disputes & Constant block motions against me: Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
- ToosieJoosie, you refer to
sarcastic edit summaries
without having linked to any; please provide diff links of what you are referring to. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:40, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Both articles Afro Tech + Afro - prolonged edit disputes & Constant block motions against me: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/1/0>
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)
- Decline as clearly premature. The AN(I) discussion is still ongoing. Izno (talk) 23:55, 17 November 2023 (UTC)