Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johannes Hill: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Johannes Hill. (TW) |
Iridescent (talk | contribs) →Johannes Hill: keep |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources AFD|Johannes Hill}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|Johannes Hill}}) |
||
Advertising, non-notable [[User:Pablomartinez|PabloMartinez]] ([[User talk:Pablomartinez|talk]]) 18:01, 1 March 2018 (UTC) |
Advertising, non-notable [[User:Pablomartinez|PabloMartinez]] ([[User talk:Pablomartinez|talk]]) 18:01, 1 March 2018 (UTC) |
||
*Weak '''keep''' in light of the coverage—it's not a huge amount but it's certainly sufficient to establish notability. A trout for this blatantly bad-faith nomination, though; what exactly do you think is "advertising" here? Do you think opera companies recruit their performers on the basis of their Wikipedia entries? ‑ [[User:Iridescent|Iridescent]] 20:04, 1 March 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:04, 1 March 2018
- Johannes Hill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Advertising, non-notable PabloMartinez (talk) 18:01, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- Weak keep in light of the coverage—it's not a huge amount but it's certainly sufficient to establish notability. A trout for this blatantly bad-faith nomination, though; what exactly do you think is "advertising" here? Do you think opera companies recruit their performers on the basis of their Wikipedia entries? ‑ Iridescent 20:04, 1 March 2018 (UTC)