Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Paul: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
collapsed banners with {{WPBS}}
Line 35: Line 35:


{{Talk:Hurricane Paul (1982)/GA1}}
{{Talk:Hurricane Paul (1982)/GA1}}

== Requested move 24 April 2017 ==

{{requested move/dated|Hurricane Paul}}

[[:Hurricane Paul (1982)]] → {{no redirect|Hurricane Paul}} – This Paul is much more prominent ([https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=all-time&pages=Hurricane_Paul_(1982)|Hurricane_Paul_(2012)|Hurricane_Paul_(2006) pageviews]) than any other Pauls. That's because he's much more destructive than any other incarnations and well, again i'll consider this as [[WP:PRIMARYTOPIC|primary topic]]. --'''[[User:SMB99thx|SMB99thx]]''' '''[[User talk:SMB99thx|XD]]''' ([[Special:Contributions/SMB99thx|contribs]]) 10:05, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:05, 24 April 2017

Good articleHurricane Paul has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 18, 2011Good article nomineeListed

Move this article

Basically, the general format is having the Hurricane Name as the retired storm, with Hurricane Name (Disambiguation as the disambiguations, unless there were no retired storms, so the disambigs would have the name and other storms would have Hurricane Name (Year). However, based on how destructive Paul was and how well-known it was as a destructive storm (IMO), I propose it gets the main article. Hurricanehink 15:03, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No objection. However I think for the atlantic, which has been more consistent about retiring names for longer, we should stick to the yearly suffix entirely for non-retired storms (though there are several "coincidentally" retired storms like Hurricane Francelia which are tempting not to add the year to). Jdorje 21:49, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Good point about storms like Francelia. That, Belle, and a few others could use a redirect for their name (like Francelia (1969) redirects to Francelia) but they can stay with the main article in my book. Especially if the storm is notable, like Alice in 1954-5. That doesn't need to be Alice (1954), but a redirect couldn't hurt. Hurricanehink 22:06, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Todo

Some more on impact, and a little more in the intro. How about a breakdown of deaths by country? What countries did the TD even strike? Jdorje 20:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is next to impossible. There is next to no info available online, so all you could do is guess and mention other storms. Hurricanehink 20:35, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I love it when I'm wrong in cases like this. Is this better? Hurricanehink 00:19, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Upgraded it to B Class Storm05 17:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern Pacific Hurricane Center

In case you don't know, the Eastern Pacific Hurricane Center in San Francisco was tasked with warning in tropical cyclones in that basin through the 1970's and most of the 1980's. I changed the line in this article...other articles may be similarly flawed. Thegreatdr 13:42, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Hurricane Paul (1982)/GA1

Requested move 24 April 2017

Hurricane Paul (1982)Hurricane Paul – This Paul is much more prominent (pageviews) than any other Pauls. That's because he's much more destructive than any other incarnations and well, again i'll consider this as primary topic. --SMB99thx XD (contribs) 10:05, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]