User talk:71.190.233.44

November 2020

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Warren Ellis . Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Your edits have been reverted. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources & Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons for more information. Sariel Xilo (talk) 04:21, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Warren Ellis. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Laser brain (talk) 15:01, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2022

Hello, I'm Manticore. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Star Trek: Discovery that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Manticore 23:58, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

• I'm not sure what your beef is with CreecregofLife, but edits like this one start to raise questions of whether you're here to improve the encyclopedia or just antagonize other users. Please put your energy into edits that are collaborative and within the guidelines of the project. —C.Fred (talk) 14:27, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

  You mean this - "hi, you mean anyone can edit kinda like wikipedia? Got it." WHich was in response to this line: "IMDb can be edited by anyone."

  Yeah, the person in question has a tendency to be all over the place when it comes to justifying his behavior. As an editor he does a crap job causing more problems than he solves. If you believe somehow my sole purpose is only to antagonize then you should and would be well within your rights to take action and ban the IP address. I would however stack my "history" up against the person in question and it will quickly become apparent who is really about antagonizing other users. I’ve left a response on your talk page as well. Honestly, I’m not big on process so if that was incorrect just delete it - seriously. It’s less of a big event in my world than Creego’s but that boy is well on a path to causing lots of problems because once is a mistake, two times a concern but the number of times he's butted heads with various people doesn’t speak all that well of him. 71.190.233.44 (talk) 22:18, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

So in essence, you're only here to bully me off the platform with vague accusations when I haven't even violated anything. You were told to stop beefing, and your answer was to escalate?--CreecregofLife (talk) 01:29, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Funny how you want to inset yourself into this and escalate. Just proves the point yet again. You're someone looking to bully others - stop playing the victim because it's not working. Also, nothing in the comment in question was untrue but apparently it "triggered" you.71.190.233.44 (talk) 11:46, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Why are you lying? You made this about me. I’m not inserting myself nor am I escalating CreecregofLife (talk) 14:33, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

(edit conflict) [To the IP:] Filing an ANI report a month after an interaction is the act that looks like escalation. If CreecregofLife's behaviour is as much of a problem as you think it is, then their actions will speak loudly enough for themselves. Frankly, your actions only serve to distract from the situation. Your best course of action, in the interest of the project, is to step away from the situation. Your best course of action, in a self-serving sense, is to step away from the situation, lest you face a block or interaction ban for your antagonism of them. —C.Fred (talk) 14:42, 20 March 2022 (UTC)