Examine individual changes

'{{tlx|Ds/aware}} == January 2017/Talk:Historical rankings of presidents of the United States == '''Your Conduct''' {{Resolved1}} [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_rankings_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States&diff=754819926&oldid=754738188] See [[Wikipedia:IPs are human too]] <sub style="border:1px solid #3333ff;padding:1px;"> </sub> <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[WP:Appealing a block|request an unblock]] by first reading the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> The full report is at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=758840989&oldid=758836875 the edit warring noticeboard]. Thank you, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 21:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC) :{{U|EdJohnston}} — note this user was blocked for 7 days for edit-warring on Dick Cheney. He immediately began edit-warring again once the block expired. In that first block I suggested not applying a indefinite block. I urge you to consider whether it may be worth it at this point. 31 hours seems rather short and somewhat arbitrary? Did you mean 31 days? [[User:CFCF|<span style="color:#014225;font-family: Copperplate Gothic Bold;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px #014225;">Carl Fredrik</span>]]<span style="font-size: .90em;">[[User talk:CFCF| 💌]] [[Special:EmailUser/CFCF|📧]]</span> 22:36, 7 January 2017 (UTC) ::Based on the users reverting their talk page as well and keeping this strange list of "Conduct Friends", I suggest a further block and TPA removal as well. Clearly [[WP:NOTHERE]] behavior. -- <b>[[User:Dane|<span style="color:blue">Dane</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Dane|<span style="color:#00AC1D;">'''talk'''</span>]]} </b> 23:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC) <div class="notice" style="background:#ffe0e0; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px"> [[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]] You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing because it appears that you are not here to [[Wikipedia:Here to build an encyclopedia#Clearly not being here to build an encyclopedia|build an encyclopedia]]. Your ability to edit your talk page has ''also'' been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then contact administrators by submitting a request to the ''[[Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System|Unblock Ticket Request System]]''. &nbsp;<span style="color: #9932CC">[[:User:KrakatoaKatie|Katie]]^{[[User talk:KrakatoaKatie|talk]]}</span> 23:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:Uw-nothereblock --> {{UTRS-unblock-user|17290|Jan 07, 2017 23:22:42|closed}}--[[User:UTRSBot|UTRSBot]] ([[User talk:UTRSBot|talk]]) 23:22, 7 January 2017 (UTC) :Talk page access ::As you were informed in response to your UTRS appeal, in which you have given clear assurance as to your future editing behaviour, I have decided to enable access to your talk page to allow you to appeal here and enable Community input into the appeal. Please post your unblock request here for Community review. You can follow the instructions at [[WP:GAB]]. If you use this talk page for any purpose other than an appeal in the terms of the UTRS appeal then I, or another Admin, will immediately indefinitely remove access to your talk page again, and that will most probably be that. [[User:Just Chilling|Just Chilling]] ([[User talk:Just Chilling|talk]]) 02:20, 11 January 2017 (UTC) {{archive top|result=The result is '''Unblock'''. Sleyece has answered all the questions put to them and there has been no opposition to an unblock. Sleyece will be aware that their edits will be closely scrutinised and that no latitude will be allowed in the event of future issues. [[User:Just Chilling|Just Chilling]] ([[User talk:Just Chilling|talk]]) 23:29, 23 January 2017 (UTC)}} {{reply to|Dane|CFCF|KrakatoaKatie|Kuru|EdJohnston|Just Chilling|=}} I wanted to take time and think of a proper response before an appeal. I apologize for causing any disruption, as it was not my intention. I have been editing in the exact opposite way of the conduct of Wikipedia. I thought, leading up to the indefinite block, the "bold" editing means that you change a page and then go to the talk page to explain what you did and why you did it. The fact that users would almost always revert edits or report me only added to my confusion and frustration. Also, I thought I had complete control of my talk page, but I have been studying the techniques to set up a bot for automatic archival, and I will not blank future information. In conclusion, if I am allowed to regain user privileges I will build consensus with other users with the goal of building an accurate and thorough encyclopedia before making any edits or changes to the site. -- [[User:Sleyece|Sleyece]] 18:57, 12 January 2017 (UTC) :{{ping|Sleyece}} I would like some information about what you were doing [[Special:Diff/758849226|here]]? This list has been taken very seriously as some sort of potential declaration against these users and there is no apparent explanation for it yet. What specific policies have you reviewed that will prevent you from participating in the same conduct that you did previously? And how would you respond to {{u|Sunshineisles2}} who you were involved in an edit war with, declaring your edits "OFFICIAL"? I would need answers to these questions before I can give my further input regarding your block. I do not mean for these questions to seem harsh, my focus is on ensuring your return would be of benefit to the encyclopedia. Thank you! -- <b>[[User:Dane|<span style="color:blue">Dane</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Dane|<span style="color:#00AC1D;">'''talk'''</span>]]} </b> 04:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC) ::{{ping|Dane}} I reviewed these policies {{policy shortcut|WP:3RR|WP:AVOIDEDITWAR|WP:CONDUCT}}. Did I miss any? If so, I will promptly review them. In response to {{u|Sunshineisles2}} as well as {{u|Motsebboh}}, I'm sorry for labeling my edits as "OFFICIAL" and edit warring. They were obviously not official, as that makes no sense. I was just confused as to why my edits were so instantly reverted, and I was warring as a result. As for the "Conduct friends" portion of my talk page. I had been keeping a list of users who I had been involved in conduct issues with. I had hoped to contact them for advice so as to end my ignorance as a user, but that obviously backfired spectacularly. As stated previously, I now know that is inappropriate use of the User's talk page. If I have left out any information in this appeal, please don't hesitate to inform me. Thank you. -- [[User:Sleyece|Sleyece]] 01:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC) :{{ping|Sleyece|Just Chilling}} Given the above explanations and apologies as well as the review of policy, I would personally '''support''' an unblock of this editor. They have adequately responded to all of my questions, in great detail and explained what steps they will take to prevent the behavior from recurring. This to me shows a commitment to working collaboratively and accepting feedback that was not present when the block was initially set. A second chance may lead to a productive editor -- so why not give it another go? -- <b>[[User:Dane|<span style="color:blue">Dane</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Dane|<span style="color:#00AC1D;">'''talk'''</span>]]} </b> 03:32, 14 January 2017 (UTC) ::{{Agree}} <sub style="border:2px solid #FF0000;padding:1px;">[[User:Adotchar|<span style="color:#000000;background:#ffffff;">Adotchar</span>]]|[[User talk:Adotchar|<span style="color:#000000;background:#ffffff;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 12:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC) {{reply to|CFCF|KrakatoaKatie|Kuru|EdJohnston|Just Chilling|=}} Were there any other questions regarding this appeal? -- [[User:Sleyece|Sleyece]] 18:25, 17 January 2017 (UTC) : I would personally like to thank all users for considering this appeal. Is it still currently being considered? An update would be greatly appreciated. -- [[User:Sleyece|Sleyece]] 15:27, 19 January 2017 (UTC) ::It is normal to allow a clear week for discussion and I currently plan to close it tomorrow. [[User:Just Chilling|Just Chilling]] ([[User talk:Just Chilling|talk]]) 19:31, 19 January 2017 (UTC) :::Sleyece, can you explain [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=758840989&oldid=758836875 the edit warring complaint] about your actions at [[Edith Wilson]]? She was President Wilson's wife, who helped him when he was ill. You insisted that she be referred to by Wikipedia as the 'de-facto President of the United States'. At the time I thought this was so outlandish that you must have been trolling or intending to provide a response. (Such wording would surely have to come from scholars and be well-supported, which it was not). Can you explain? Thank you, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 21:08, 19 January 2017 (UTC) ::::{{reply to|EdJohnston|=}} that is an excellent point, and I forgot to mention that I will not make edits without proper citations. I did here [[Talk:Warren_G._Harding|Talk:Warren G. Harding]], but I did not understand Wikipedia's conduct. Therefore, my edits were inconsistent. I have a much firmer grasp of policies and expectations now. As for [[Edith_Wilson|Edith Wilson]], I edited based on a personal opinion and an overestimation of the remainder of the data on that page. I failed to seek consensus with other editors, which I will do in the future. - [[User:Sleyece|Sleyece]] 02:26, 20 January 2017 (UTC) ::::*I will seek consensus with other editors in the future - [[User:Sleyece|Sleyece]] 02:26, 20 January 2017 (UTC) :::{{reply to|Just Chilling|=}} Has the discussion on this appeal currently closed? I am eager, hopefully, to have the opportunity to improve as an editor. - [[User:Sleyece|Sleyece]] 17:14, 22 January 2017 (UTC) ::::I know that you are anxious for this application to be closed but questions are still being asked and answered. It is important that everyone has the fullest opportunity to discuss their concerns. Having said that, I note that no-one has yet expressed opposition to lifting the block and I hope to be able to close soon. [[User:Just Chilling|Just Chilling]] ([[User talk:Just Chilling|talk]]) 01:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC) Sleyece, can you explain what the "Conduct Friends" section was that you added? Thanks, <sub style="border:2px solid #FF0000;padding:1px;">[[User:Adotchar|<span style="color:#000000;background:#ffffff;">Adotchar</span>]]|[[User talk:Adotchar|<span style="color:#000000;background:#ffffff;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 01:06, 23 January 2017 (UTC) :{{reply to|Adotchar|=}} (Stated previously in response to {{user|Dane}}: "I had been keeping a list of users who I had been involved in conduct issues with. I had hoped to contact them for advice so as to end my ignorance as a user") Of course, there seems to have been a lot of confusion as to my intentions with "Conduct Friends." I thought I had unrestricted control of the user's talk page, and I was trying to keep a convenient list of users/admins that I had been involved with conduct issues with in my short stint on Wikipedia. I had planned to use the list to get advice from other users about how I should conduct myself on Wikipedia, so I could avoid issues in the future. I now understand that the list was itself a violation of Wikipedia's policy, and that behavior will not be repeated if I am allowed to continue as an editor. - [[User:Sleyece|Sleyece]] 01:41, 23 January 2017 (UTC) Unless there are further questions, I will await a consensus from administrators on my potential to be a successful Wikipedia editor in the future. - [[User:Sleyece|Sleyece]] 21:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC) {{archive bottom}} I wanted you to know that I refactored your hatting of the talk page thread "User: Sleyece; Comments, Concerns, and Feedback". According to [[Template:Atop]] editors are not supposed to hat discussions they have been involved in. I retained your hatting comment that a new discussion should be started at the end of that thread. [[User:Shearonink|Shearonink]] ([[User talk:Shearonink|talk]]) 17:01, 25 June 2017 (UTC) : Okay, {{u|Shearonink}}, I understand. I am now aware of that [[Wikipedia:Templates|template]], and I will employ it in the future. == Your signature == Hi. I don't know how you're doing it, but somehow the time/date stamps in your signatures have a nonstandard format that will not be recognized by certain software functions including archive bots. Are you signing using the four tildes as shown at [[WP:SIGHOW]]? ―[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#999;">&#9742;</span>]] 20:08, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Oh, sorry {{u|Mandruss}}, I have not been doing that. I have just been using a simple '-' to indicate possession. From now on I will '[[User:Sleyece|Sleyece]] ([[User talk:Sleyece#top|talk]]) 01:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)' to alert the archive bots. : I have been manually filling out my signature, in case you were still wondering. ::Looks much better, thanks. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#999;">&#9742;</span>]] 17:12, 11 July 2017 (UTC) == Incidents at Talk:Anita Sarkeesian == Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I edited your comments [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAnita_Sarkeesian&type=revision&diff=787205820&oldid=787195305 here] only because they broke the page. If you have any questions, please let me know. Cheers! [[User:Woodroar|Woodroar]] ([[User talk:Woodroar|talk]]) 02:01, 24 June 2017 (UTC) Hey, just wanted to drop by and say that I see you changed the indenting, but I think you did so incorrectly, no offense. Often, where there's an edit conflict ("e/c"), two comments will be at the same indent level--because they're responding to the same original. Woodroar couldn't have been responding to my comment, because that's where the e/c came from. The way you've set it up makes it seem as if it was a neat chronological step-to-step, but it wasn't, quite. Not a big deal, just wanted to offer that thought. Have a nice day! [[User:Dumuzid|Dumuzid]] ([[User talk:Dumuzid|talk]]) 15:38, 4 September 2017 (UTC) : I see what you're saying, {{u|Dumuzid}}. I reverted the edit, thanks. == Regarding the Donald Trump handshakes talk == I still have not seen any good reason in any of the talk page or deletion discussions for that article. It is clearly NPOV. Also I was not seriously suggesting making a [[Vladimir Putin and walking]] article, I was using that to make a point — how ridiculous the whole concept of this article is. Anyway, just noticed that you closed the discussion and your rationale, and so I just wanted to let you know that my intentions are not malevolent. I am genuinely curious — again, people are saying that this has already been discussed, yet so far no good reason to keep the article has actually been presented, or how the article is not so blatantly NPOV. Just because the mainstream media, which has been demonizing Trump 24/7 for the past eight months, starts going on and on about his handshakes, that does not require Wikipedia to make an article about every single contrived scandal they come up with. [[User:Romanov loyalist|Romanov loyalist]] ([[User talk:Romanov loyalist|talk]]) 16:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC) :{{u|Romanov loyalist}}, Please do not come to my talk page to levy general complaints. If there is a specific policy you think I may have violated, you can post it here. Also, if you think I deserve a Barnstar, which, from context clues, seems unlikely, you may post that here. Thank you. ==Your draft article, [[User:Sleyece/Historical rankings of Presidents of the United States]]== [[File:Information icon4.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]] Hello, Sleyece. It has been over six months since you last edited the [[WP:AFC|Articles for Creation]] submission or [[WP:Drafts|Draft]] page you started, "[[User:Sleyece/Historical rankings of Presidents of the United States|Historical rankings of Presidents of the United States]]". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia [[WP:mainspace|mainspace]], the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|User:Sleyece/Historical rankings of Presidents of the United States|edit the submission}} and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at [[WP:REFUND/G13|this link]]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:JMHamo|JMHamo]] ([[User talk:JMHamo|talk]]) 21:58, 20 May 2018 (UTC) : Thank you {{ping|JMHamo}}, but a consensus has already been reached on that draft. I don't need it anymore. [[User:Sleyece|Sleyece]] ([[User talk:Sleyece#top|talk]]) 19:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC) == Gamergate controversy discretionary sanctions alert == {{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' '''Please carefully read this information:''' The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate|here]]. Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. }}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Woodroar|Woodroar]] ([[User talk:Woodroar|talk]]) 01:07, 5 July 2018 (UTC) == Notice & Request == [[Special:Permalink/866977226#Self-Block Request|Per your request]], I have blocked your account for two weeks. ~ <span style="color:#DF00A0">Amory</span><small style="color:#555"> ''([[User:Amorymeltzer|u]] • [[User talk:Amorymeltzer|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Amorymeltzer|c]])''</small> 20:33, 2 November 2018 (UTC) {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[WP:AC/DS|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[WP:AC/DS#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[WP:AC/DS#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the [[WP:AC/DS#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[WP:ArbCom|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. }}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Levivich|Leviv]]&thinsp;<span style="display:inline-block;transform:rotate(45deg);position:relative;bottom:-.57em;">[[User talk:Levivich|ich]]</span> 02:02, 27 February 2019 (UTC) {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[WP:AC/DS|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[WP:AC/DS#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[WP:AC/DS#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the [[WP:AC/DS#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[WP:ArbCom|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. }}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Levivich|Leviv]]&thinsp;<span style="display:inline-block;transform:rotate(45deg);position:relative;bottom:-.57em;">[[User talk:Levivich|ich]]</span> 02:03, 27 February 2019 (UTC) Hi! I noticed you're repeatedly changing the infobox at [[Bernie Sanders]] to list him as a Democrat ([[Special:Diff/884160827|diff]], [[Special:Diff/884559374|diff]], [[Special:Diff/885185811|diff]], [[Special:Diff/885278039|diff]]). I reverted the most recent change just now. I wanted to bring to your attention that there is a discussion about this at [[Talk:Bernie Sanders|the article's talk page]]. Also, editors have been reverting you and pointing you to the discussion in edit summaries. Also, there is a <nowiki><!-- comment --></nowiki> in the code about this that you don't seem to be noticing. So, I thought I'd post at your talk page. Note that this article is under two sets of [[WP:ACDS|discretionary sanctions]], one for [[WP:BLP|BLP]] and one for post-1932 American politics; I've posted both notices above. Please don't change the infobox to Democrat until there is consensus on the talk page, but please do join the conversation there. Thank you and happy editing! [[User:Levivich|Leviv]]&thinsp;<span style="display:inline-block;transform:rotate(45deg);position:relative;bottom:-.57em;">[[User talk:Levivich|ich]]</span> 02:08, 27 February 2019 (UTC) == Discretionary sanctions alert - gender, BLP and American politics == Hi - you've added an AfD template at [[Mansplaining]], but you haven't created a deletion discussion. Perhaps you're doing it manually, something I've never attempted, so I'll give it a few minutes before removing the template; for future reference, it's ''much'' easier to nominate articles for deletion using [[WP:TWINKLE]]. [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#294;">Girth</span><span style="font-family:Impact;color:#42c;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:script;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 12:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC) :I can't see that a deletion discussion has been created, so I've removed the template. Cheers [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#294;">Girth</span><span style="font-family:Impact;color:#42c;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:script;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 12:43, 5 May 2020 (UTC) {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. }}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic.}} :This Administrative decision is a violation of several Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, and formal legal action against the Wikimedia Foundation is possible. -- [[User:Sleyece|Sleyece]] ([[User talk:Sleyece#top|talk]]) 13:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC) Hi Sleyece, I noticed what you just wrote above in response to the notices that {{u|Doug Weller}} left you. I'm not sure which administrative decision you're referring you - Doug didn't make an administrative decision, he just left you some standard notices to bring some matters to your attention - but you need to familiarise yourself with the information at [[WP:NLT|NLT]]. Please clarify what you are saying above - are you threatening some sort of legal action? Cheers [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#294;">Girth</span><span style="font-family:Impact;color:#42c;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:script;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 13:25, 5 May 2020 (UTC) : It wasn't a legal threat or intention to take a legal action, no. I was pointing out that blanket protections of information on a site like this would be a Felony in the U.S., and I hope it is being used cautiously. -- [[User:Sleyece|Sleyece]] ([[User talk:Sleyece#top|talk]]) 13:29, 5 May 2020 (UTC) ::OK, thanks for clarifying that. I'm not sure what you think is illegal about any of this - you might want to read the Terms of Use, if you haven't already - there's a link to them just above the 'Publish' button, whenever you edit a page. I assure you, there's nothing illegal in the US about the use of discretionary sanctions. [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#294;">Girth</span><span style="font-family:Impact;color:#42c;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:script;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 13:43, 5 May 2020 (UTC) ::: Yes there is; it violates [https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/5736 this] for starters; also see Amendment I, and I would argue Amendment IV (since anyone can edit, blanket sanctions could be a private search and seizure). I'm just saying, y'all are playing w/ fire. -- [[User:Sleyece|Sleyece]] ([[User talk:Sleyece#top|talk]]) 13:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC) ::::{{u|Sleyece}}, I still don't understand why you think any of them would apply, but that doesn't particularly matter. So long as you are not making legal threats of any kind, and you understand that discretionary sanctions may be applied by any administrator when dealing with editors acting in these subject areas, we're good. [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#294;">Girth</span><span style="font-family:Impact;color:#42c;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:script;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 13:55, 5 May 2020 (UTC) ::::::{{re|Girth Summit}} however, this could be seen as chilling, s<s>o I'm taking it to ANI.</s> [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 14:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC) :::::::Nah, the important thing, Sleyece, is that you don't say this to other editors or anywhere else. At that point I think it would be seen as chilling and thus the equivalent of a legal threat. You're wrong anyway. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 14:47, 5 May 2020 (UTC) :::::::: [[WP:KEEPCOOL]] -- [[User:Sleyece|Sleyece]] ([[User talk:Sleyece#top|talk]]) 14:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC) :::::::::Doug is, in my experience, the epitome of cool - he's like a well-educated Fonze. He's right though - you can think what you like, but going around saying that administrative rulings are not compliant with the law is only going to lead in one direction, one which none of us want to take. Let's all chill on that point. [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#294;">Girth</span><span style="font-family:Impact;color:#42c;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:script;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 15:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC) [[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further warning''' the next time you make [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|personal attacks]] on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.<!-- Template:uw-npa4 --> <small>Signed,</small>[[User:The4lines|The4lines]] &#124;&#124;&#124;&#124; ^{([[User talk:The4lines|You Asked?]]) ([[special:Contributions/The4lines|What I have Done.]])} 17:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC) :Understood. -- [[User:Sleyece|Sleyece]] ([[User talk:Sleyece#top|talk]]) 17:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC) ::Sleyece, I hope you don't mind this intrusion on your talk page. {{u|The4lines}} - would you mind letting me know that the personal attack that justified a 4im warning here? Thanks [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#294;">Girth</span><span style="font-family:Impact;color:#42c;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:script;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 18:28, 21 May 2020 (UTC) :::I do mind. Please see my user page under the "First" heading for more details. ::::OK, I'll take it elsewhere; I'll just explain to you that on the face of it, I don't see anything in your recent contributions that would justify such a warning, and I was concerned that it might have influenced your decision to take a break. I'll respect your wishes from this point out, unless you ping me and ask me to clarify further. [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#294;">Girth</span><span style="font-family:Impact;color:#42c;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:script;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 18:43, 21 May 2020 (UTC) ::::Right, this really will be my last note about this - the other user has accepted that their level 4 big red warning was excessive, and should not have been issued. I wish you well with the issues you outlined on your user page. Stay safe. [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#294;">Girth</span><span style="font-family:Impact;color:#42c;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:script;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 19:34, 21 May 2020 (UTC) ==Your draft article, [[Draft:C. Landon Roberson]]== [[File:Information icon4.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]] Hello, Sleyece. It has been over six months since you last edited the [[WP:AFC|Articles for Creation]] submission or [[WP:Drafts|Draft]] page you started, "[[Draft:C. Landon Roberson|C. Landon Roberson]]". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia [[WP:mainspace|mainspace]], the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can [[WP:REFUND/G13|request its undeletion]]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 19:20, 11 May 2021 (UTC) :https://en.everybodywiki.com/C._Landon_Roberson ==Edit Warring== '''Strauss–Howe generational theory''' I'll spare you the template but I do not understand your incorrect edits on [[Strauss–Howe generational theory]]. You inserting incorrect information and edit warring, so please cease immediately. Please consider this a warning against [edit] warring (see [[WP:EW]] for explanations). [[User:EvergreenFir|'''<span style="color:#8b00ff;">Eve</span><span style="color:#6528c2;">rgr</span><span style="color:#3f5184;">een</span><span style="color:#197947;">Fir</span>''']] [[User talk:EvergreenFir|(talk)]] 06:20, 10 January 2022 (UTC) : Noted, and I'll drop it for now. I don't appreciate getting slapped with a vandalism template on an article with a multiple issues tag for the record. :: Also, I was not edit warring or violating 3RR, so if I was blocked because you were mad I reverted your IP Edit it would be immediately undone by other admins through the ticket system. <div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Partial blocks|blocked]]''' from editing<!-- --> from certain pages ([[:Strauss–Howe generational theory]]) for a period of '''72 hours''' for edit warring, disruptive editing, and removal of sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. &nbsp;[[User:EvergreenFir|'''<span style="color:#8b00ff;">Eve</span><span style="color:#6528c2;">rgr</span><span style="color:#3f5184;">een</span><span style="color:#197947;">Fir</span>''']] [[User talk:EvergreenFir|(talk)]] 06:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-pblock --> You had to add an additional source that wasn't there before to "justify" a block, but since it's only on this page, I'll just let you have this W and edit elsewhere. -- [[User:Sleyece|Sleyece]] ([[User talk:Sleyece#top|talk]]) 17:12, 14 January 2022 (UTC) :The other two sources were perfectly fine. I added another one just to drive it home. Your edit summary was incorrect and your edits are disruptive. [[User:EvergreenFir|'''<span style="color:#8b00ff;">Eve</span><span style="color:#6528c2;">rgr</span><span style="color:#3f5184;">een</span><span style="color:#197947;">Fir</span>''']] [[User talk:EvergreenFir|(talk)]] 00:38, 15 January 2022 (UTC) :: That's total bullshit and you know it, lmao. You're just mad that you initially took my side, then you decided that I'm the "villain" and the IP editor must be protected at all costs. You're being an admin like a comic book writer and it's hilarious. I haven't violated ANY policy. You're just abusing your power. ::: Go complain on [[WP:ANI]] if you want. The info was readily verifiable and you removed it anyway. Before that, you added [[WP:NOR|made-up]] date ranges that was contradicted by the sources. [[User:EvergreenFir|'''<span style="color:#8b00ff;">Eve</span><span style="color:#6528c2;">rgr</span><span style="color:#3f5184;">een</span><span style="color:#197947;">Fir</span>''']] [[User talk:EvergreenFir|(talk)]] 21:17, 15 January 2022 (UTC) ::::Just leave me tf alone! Attitudes like yours are why I quit my Sociology major. It's such a weird and intense response for a three day block on a single article that has a multiple issues tag. I know this pandemic is stressful, and everyone is going through it, but don't take it out on me. -- [[User:Sleyece|Sleyece]] ([[User talk:Sleyece#top|talk]]) 23:02, 15 January 2022 (UTC) '''June 2022''' [[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Kayleigh McEnany]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|the bold, revert, discuss cycle]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:VQuakr|VQuakr]] ([[User talk:VQuakr|talk]]) 02:26, 19 June 2022 (UTC) :[[User:VQuakr|VQuakr]] Please be aware I was not edit warring. My revert should be checked against [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Infoboxes|Manual of Style]] before you come on my talk page ::No, don't edit war even if you believe you are right. The MOS is irrelevant. [[User:VQuakr|VQuakr]] ([[User talk:VQuakr|talk]]) 17:07, 6 July 2022 (UTC) :::[[User:VQuakr|VQuakr]] If I have policy on my side, I don't play nice. I'll revert when I have to. For the record, I didn't "believe" I was right. I WAS right. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Sleyece|Sleyece]] ([[User talk:Sleyece#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sleyece|contribs]]) </span> ::::The relevant policy is [[WP:NOT3RR]]. You'll note that being correct is not one of the listed exemptions. See [[WP:DISCUSS]] and [[WP:CIVIL]] since you seem to have some brushing up to do on those, too. [[User:VQuakr|VQuakr]] ([[User talk:VQuakr|talk]]) 19:00, 6 July 2022 (UTC) :::::I declare myself the winner here. This exchange is over. -- [[User:Sleyece|Sleyece]] ([[User talk:Sleyece#top|talk]]) 19:09, 6 July 2022 (UTC) ::::::And [[WP:BATTLE]]. All the best to you and yours. [[User:VQuakr|VQuakr]] ([[User talk:VQuakr|talk]]) 19:20, 6 July 2022 (UTC) == Page restrictions and [[Donald Trump]] article == [[File:Commons-emblem-notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message ''does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your editing.'' Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see [[Wikipedia:Contentious topics]]. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see [[WP:CTVSDS]].<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --><br> [[File:Commons-emblem-notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] You have recently made edits related to articles about [[WP:Biographies of living persons|living or recently deceased people]], and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about [[WP:Biographies of living persons|living or recently deceased people]], and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message ''does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your editing.'' Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see [[Wikipedia:Contentious topics]]. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see [[WP:CTVSDS]].<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --><br> You have violated the page restriction on [[Donald Trump]] by reinstating your edit without waiting 24 hours and discussing on the talk page. Please undo your second edit. The rationale in your edit summary is contrary to the authorized page restriction, and you may be blocked from editing for this violation. Again, please self-revert your second edit that created the violation.[[User:SPECIFICO |<b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 04:14, 20 February 2023 (UTC)'