Draft:Critical disability studies
Critical disability studies (CDS), also referred to as critical disability theory (CDT), is an intersectional and interdisciplinary field of study that critically examines the social, cultural, political, and historical dimensions of disability. The field aims to analyze and challenge power relations, systemic inequalities, and societal structures that contribute to the marginalization of disabled individuals. Beyond an academic approach, CDS proponents aim to improve the lives of disabled individuals through systemic change. CDS is closely connected with disability justice.
History
[edit]CDS developed from disability studies and the Frankfurt School's approach to critical theory, which "identifies, describes, and analyzes the subsumed or hidden origins of social and political culture, discourses, and institutions".[1] Beyond this, critical theorists often aim to "instigate social change by providing knowledge of the forces of social inequality".[2]
Definition
[edit]According to the Critical Disability Studies Collective at the University of Minnesota,
Critical disability studies is an approach that centers the understanding of disability as a political, cultural, and historical experience. In CDS, disability is understood as intersecting and interwoven with other systems of power and oppression, transnationally. When we talk about issues related to disability, we must always consider how race, class, gender, sexuality, and citizenship are also connected. [...] CDS is not only an academic endeavor. It has deep connections to disability justice activism, community scholarship, and grassroots organizing. CDS is often based in the humanities and/or social sciences, but most CDS is interdisciplinary.[3]
Meekosha and Shuttleworth highlight the following principles:[4]
- Social life cannot be reduced to objective facts.
- Theory needs to be linked with praxis "in the struggle for an autonomous and participatory society".
- A discipline or field of study must " be aware of its own historicity and critically reflect on its conceptual framework".
- Proponents must "engage in a dialogue with other cultures on the issues and concepts of current significance".
Core concepts
[edit]See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Hall, Melinda C. (2019), "Critical Disability Theory", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 2024-02-05
- ^ Rush, F. (2004). "Conceptual foundations of early critical theory". The Cambridge companion to critical theory. Cambridge University Press. pp. 6–39.
- ^ "FAQs | Critical Disability Studies Collective". University of Minnesota. Retrieved 2024-02-05.
- ^ Meekosha, Helen; Shuttleworth, Russell (November 2009). "What's so 'critical' about critical disability studies?". Australian Journal of Human Rights. 15 (1): 47–75. doi:10.1080/1323238X.2009.11910861. ISSN 1323-238X.