Jump to content

Cross Valley Corridor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cross Valley Corridor
Technical
Track gauge1,435 mm (4 ft 8+12 in) standard gauge
Route map

Huron
Lemoore NAS
Lemoore
Hanford
Amtrak
Kings–Tulare
California High-Speed Rail
Goshen
Visalia
Farmersville
Exeter
Lindsay
Strathmore
Porterville

The Cross Valley Corridor is a proposed passenger rail service in the California Central Valley, connecting Visalia, Hanford, Porterville, and surrounding cities to each other and California High-Speed Rail's planned Kings–Tulare Regional Station.[1][2]

Design

[edit]

Route

[edit]

The 80-mile (130 km) route is proposed to run east–west, mostly along existing tracks.[1] These rights-of way were originally constructed in the 1870s and 1880s by the Southern Pacific Railroad, which founded all the cities along the corridor when it first laid tracks, with the exception of the older city of Visalia. The tracks are currently owned by the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR), with the San Joaquin Valley Railroad operating on nearly all of the corridor, except for a 1 mi (1.6 km) portion of the Union Pacific mainline connecting the eastern and western branches near Goshen.[2]

The specific subdivisions projected for re-use as the CVC are:

  • Hanford Subdivision (owned by UPRR), from Huron to SR 99
  • Goshen Subdivision (UPRR), from SR 99 to Exeter
  • Exeter Subdivision (UPRR), from Exeter to Lindsay
  • Exeter right-of-way (City of Porterville), from Lindsay to Porterville

The projected termini are in Porterville (east) and Huron (west); the route follows SR 198 and SR 65.[3]: 17  The easternmost 6 miles (9.7 km) of the route between Strathmore and Porterville were abandoned and the tracks pulled up, but the land was purchased by the City of Porterville to preserve the right-of-way.[1]

Stations

[edit]
Potential Cross-Valley Connector rail stations
No. Name Location Sub City County Notes / Refs.
1 Huron Lassen & 9th Hanford Huron Fresno [3]: 87 
2 NAS Lemoore 4,000 ft (1,200 m) N of Franklin Ave Lemoore Station Kings Serving Naval Air Station Lemoore[3]: 88 
3 West Hills College Lemoore Near Bush St Lemoore Serving West Hills College Lemoore[3]: 88–89 
4 Downtown Lemoore Heinlen & E [3]: 90 
5 Armona 14th Ave Armona [3]: 91 
6 Hanford Seventh & Santa Fe Hanford Connects to Amtrak (San Joaquins);[3]: 91  two alternative sites to the east also proposed[3]: 92–93 
7 Kings/Tulare 12 mi (0.80 km) E of SR 43 & 2,000 ft (610 m) N of SR 198 [3]: 93 
8 Goshen Ave 308 & Camp Dr Goshen Goshen Tulare Two alternative sites to the east also proposed.[3]: 93–94 
9 Visalia Industrial Goshen Rd, between American & Plaza Visalia Potential infill station, serving employment areas[3]: 95–96 
10 Visalia Transit Center E Oak & N Bridge [3]: 95 
11 Visalia (2) Ben Maddox & K Potential infill station, serving residential areas[3]: 95 
12 Farmersville W Front & N Farmersville Farmersville [3]: 96–97 
13 Exeter N G & W Pine Exeter Exeter Alternative option at Chestnut & F[3]: 97–98 
14 Lindsay Sweetbriar Ave & Honolulu St Lindsay Alternative option nearby[3]: 98–99 
15 Strathmore Ave 196 & Orange Belt Strathmore [3]: 99 
16 Porterville Transit Center N D & W Oak Porterville [3]: 100–99 
Proposed stations for Cross Valley Corridor (†: termini)
  •  Fresno County 
  •  Kings County 
  •  Tulare County 

1
Huron
2
NAS Lemoore
3
West Hills College Lemoore
4
Lemoore
5
Armona
6
Hanford (Option 1) Amtrak
7
Kings—Tulare California High-Speed Rail
8
Goshen
9
Visalia Industrial Park (potential infill)
10
Visalia Transit Center
11
Visalia (Ben Maddox) (potential infill)
12
Farmersville
13
Exeter
14
Lindsay
15
Strathmore
16
Porterville Transit Center†

Phased implementation

[edit]

In a projected Phase 1 to occur within ten years of opening CAHSR service, existing and new local bus services from cities along the projected CVC route would be coordinated to run to the planned Kings/Tulare high-speed rail station.[3]: 51  Phase 2 would replace bus services within 20 years of opening CAHSR for the central portion of CVC, between Lemoore and Visalia, and open a rail maintenance facility in that segment.[3]: 53  Phase 3, set to begin more than 20 years after CAHSR, would complete the entire CVC rail service; within Tulare County, bus services would connect the CVC station in Visalia with local communities.[3]: 54  The cost of the total project was estimated at US$350 to 489 million, split approximately 50% to Phase 3, 48% to Phase 2, and 2% to Phase 1.[3]: 55 

History

[edit]

Initial studies of a passenger rail service were conducted in the mid-1990s.[2][4] A Cross Valley Rail Corridor Joint Powers Authority was founded, which raised $14.2 million from government and private sources to resurface the rail corridor in 2002–2003 to accommodate heavier freight traffic, and keep the line in operation in preparation for a passenger rail service.[4][5][6] A 2004 study revisited passenger rail plans.[7]

California High-Speed Rail offered $600,000 in funding for a station planning grant including the Cross Valley Corridor, providing that the City of Hanford (which is in Kings County) and Tulare County each provided $100,000 in matching funds. Hanford and Kings County have strongly opposed the high-speed rail project, while Visalia and Tulare County have supported it. In August 2015, the Hanford City Council voted not to spend the funds, but Tulare County officials proceeded with the planning process.[8][9]

In April 2017, the Tulare County Association of Governments released an existing conditions report.[2] In June 2018, it approved a final plan.[10][11] The line was included in the 2018 California State Rail Plan as part of the 2040 Vision.[12][13][14]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c Ellis, Reggie (September 6, 2017). "Plan to revive rail between Kings and Tulare counties, public workshop Sept. 13". The Foothills Sun-Gazette. Retrieved September 21, 2017.
  2. ^ a b c d "Cross Valley Corridor Plan Existing Conditions Report" (PDF). Tulare County Association of Governments. April 19, 2017. pp. 5–7, 112, 139. Retrieved September 21, 2017.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v Mott MacDonald; QK; VRPA Technologies; Economic & Planning Systems; Jakes Associates Inc; Zumwalt-Hansen (March 2018). Cross Valley Corridor Plan (Report). Tulare County Association of Governments. Retrieved January 25, 2022.
  4. ^ a b Yamashita, Eiji (September 27, 2003). "Cross Valley rail work is complete, celebration set". Hanford Sentinel. Retrieved September 21, 2017.
  5. ^ "Cross Valley Rail Corridor Groundbreaking Ceremony". City of Lemoore. May 3, 2002. Archived from the original on September 21, 2017. Retrieved September 21, 2017.
  6. ^ "RailAmerica's San Joaquin Valley Railroad Joins the Celebration to Mark the Completion of the Cross Valley Rail Corridor". BusinessWire. October 9, 2003. Retrieved September 21, 2017.
  7. ^ "Cross Valley Rail Corridor Passenger Rail Study" (PDF). Kings County Association of Governments. June 1, 2004. Retrieved September 21, 2017.
  8. ^ Lindt, John (August 5, 2015). "Hanford council nixes rail station planning grant". The Business Journal. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved October 28, 2015.
  9. ^ Camarena, Andrea (October 7, 2015). "Visalia on-board with High Speed Rail study". The Foothills Sun-Gazette. Retrieved October 28, 2015.
  10. ^ Castellon, David (June 19, 2018). "Commuter train through Kings, Tulare Counties proposed". The Business Journal. Retrieved June 24, 2018.
  11. ^ Johnson, Brian (June 21, 2018). "Cross Valley Corridor train would connect South Valley to High-Speed Rail". ABC30 Fresno. Retrieved June 24, 2018.
  12. ^ "2018 California State Rail Plan (Draft)" (PDF). CalTrans. Retrieved November 7, 2017.
  13. ^ "Lindsay lands $250K deal for new transit center". December 25, 2019.
  14. ^ Stone, Jesse (February 8, 2023). "Hanford can match grant requirement for rail corridor funding". The Hanford Sentinel. Retrieved September 11, 2023.
[edit]