Ákos Barcsay
![]() | This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. (January 2024) |
Akos Barcsay, (Achatius) (c.1610 ? - Kozmatelke July 1661) was Prince of Transylvania from September 14, 1658 to December 31, 1660. Barcsay's reign of a little over two years was a period of considerable domestic and international turmoil. It occurred during the end of Transylvania's "golden age" and saw the renewal of Ottoman power under an energetic new grand vizier, Mehmet Koprulu. Prince Barcsay had the unenviable task of satisfying draconian Turkish territorial and financial demands while attempting to keep his deposed predecessor - Prince George II Rakoczy - at bay. It was an almost impossible task. Analysis of his career by Hungarian historians shows him to have been a weak character prone to taking the easy option best suited to his self-interests. His marriage to a fifteen-year-old girl, with whom he became obsessed, was frowned upon by his contemporaries, not because of her age but because Barcsay was said to focus on little else other than his obsession. His name does not register among the greats of Hungarian history and many studies dismiss him as a charlatan. >ref<[[ In Hungarian see: DR. SZALAY JÓZSEF A MILLENIUM ALKALMÁBÓL ÁTDOLGOZTA ÉS ÚJBÓL SAJTÓ ALÁ RENDEZTE DR. BARÓTI LAJOS KÖZEL EZER ILLUSZTRÁCZIÓVAL ÉS SZÁMOS MŰMELLÉKLETTEL. BUDAPEST, LAMPEL RÓBERT (WODIANER F. ÉS FIAI) CS. ÉS KIR. UDVARI KÖNYVKERESKEDÉS KIADÁSA.]]>ref< Barcsay had no direct male heirs, so his line died with him. Various claimants to descent from Barcsay have recently emerged in Transylvania and Hungary. Most respected sources prove these claims to be spurious and bogus. Akos Barcsay de Nagybarcsa was born to an old and distinguished Calvinist noble family of Hunyad (Hunedoara) county, in southern Transylvania, whose origins reach back to the mid-13th century. His father, Sandor (Alexander) Barcsay, Vice-Comes (Alispan) of Hunyad county, had been a courtier, envoy and soldier. His mother was Erzsebet (Elizabeth) Palatics de Illadia daughter of Gyorgy (George) Palatics, Ban (Governor) of Lugos and Karansebes (Lugoj and Caransebes). On both sides, Akos Barcsay was the descendant of prominent Transylvanian and Hungarian families - Bogathy, Zalasdy, Seredy, Fanchy and Varday among others.[1]
He grew up at the court of Prince Gabriel Bethlen. The first significant station in his career was an embassy to the Sublime Porte in 1642 in the service of George I Rákóczy. In 1648 he was chief governor of the Hunyad county. Prince George II Rákóczy appointed him princely councilor in 1657 and governor for the time of his campaign to Poland.
The Turks deposed Rákóczy after his unfortunate and unauthorised campaign and had Ferenc Rhédey elected prince on 2 November 1657. However, Rákóczy returned in January 1658 and forced the Diet to recognize him on 25 January 1658. As a reaction the Turks invaded Transylvania, leaving a trail of destruction through the country. Grand Vizier Köprülü Mehmed Pasha appointed Barcsay as prince on 14 September 1658, and the Diet had to agree to the payment of a high tribute and recognition of Barcsay's principality (11 October).
Rákóczy invaded Transylvania again, and Barcsay fled to the Pasha of Timișoara (August 1659). When Rákóczy was killed in battle in June 1660, Barcsay was reinstated , but a new pretender to the throne appeared in the person of János Kemény. He relied on the Székelys who were radically against Barcsay's collaboration with the Turks and hoped for the help of the Viennese court. He invaded Transylvania in November 1660. Although Barcsay had voluntarily abdicated on 11 December 1660, the new prince had him imprisoned in Görgény and his brother Andreas hanged. He finally correctly accused Barcsay of having contacted the Turks from prison and had him assassinated in July 1661.
References
[edit]- ^ Kis Balint: Erdely Regi Csaladai, A Barcsai Csalad (Old Transylvanian Families, The Barcsai Family) in: Turul A magyar Heraldikai es Genealogiai Tarsasag Kozlonye, Budapest 1894, 2/3/4 pp.69-75, 182, 185