Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dallas Woodburn (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 01:12, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dallas Woodburn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence that this person is "important or widely cited. No evidence of a "significant new concept or technique". No major role in in creating a body of work; just a few magazine articles and a couple self-published books. Claims several awards with no references; searching for the awards relveals mostly search-optimized link bomb sites leading back to the subject's vanity web page. Can't find any notability in the claimed awards. Therefore, this subject fails WP:AUTHOR and should be deleted. -- Mikeblas (talk) 21:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable writer and journalist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:14, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The article is pretty clear that they fail WP:AUTHOR Jeepday (talk) 14:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:15, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:15, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Her work and awards are not notable. Bearian (talk) 15:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.