User talk:ReaperSox

Welcome

Hello, ReaperSox, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 17:19, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Mame Baba Thiam

Just a reminder, when you update the infobox, please update the parameter "club-update=" to the date you edit and/or last game the player played (it looks no different if you are using the latest stats). Matthew_hk t c 17:50, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Patrick Cutrone

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Patrick Cutrone, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Luxic (talk) 16:53, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alessandro Plizzari

added a link pointing to Crema

Patrick Cutrone

added a link pointing to Striker

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alessandro Plizzari

The article Alessandro Plizzari has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:47, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Medhi Benatia

No such thing of "transfer window" for loan deal turn definitive transfer. Unless the club want the legal and financial effect was delayed to 1 July (in the next financial and sport season) and stated in the press release, the deal happened immediately on the date of press release. Don't add original research on Medhi Benatia's deal for alleged effective on 1 July 2017. Matthew_hk t c 03:56, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Ounas

It is not helpful to add transfer rumour to wikipedia. as of 11:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC), no press release in www.ssscnapoli.it even for any medical. Matthew_hk t c 11:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Antonio Donnarumma

Antonio Donnarumma return to Milan is entirely a transfer rumour and nothing is official yet. Matthew_hk t c 10:03, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Álvaro Morata, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:54, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gabriel Obertan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Marko Arnautović. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:15, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox dates

Hi, when updating infobox stats you should update the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats, by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 23:58, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep this in mind. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:09, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bump. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:52, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bump Twice. Govvy (talk) 13:27, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Orji Okwonkwo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 17:46, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Sandro Ramírez. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:21, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ReaperSox. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Son Heung-min. Incorrect figure added to infobox. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:53, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Troy Deeney, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Same as above, wrong figure added to infobox. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:13, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Updating stats

Hi; I just wanted to inform you that on wikipedia it is protocol to update football players' appearance and goal stats (and the dates) in the tables and infoboxes only after the match has ended, and not before. Thanks, and happy editing! Best regards, Messirulez (talk) 21:23, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks updating stats, but you really do need to wait until the game is completely over. You updated Insigne’s appearances and then he scored a goal so you had to go back. The stats should be updated only after the match is complete. Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 03:08, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ReaperSox: I considered you removed my comment is a kind of read and archive Special:Diff/852079482 but it seem you keep on doing so by changing stats without stating where the data came from such as this edit Special:Diff/852080648 on Santiago Colombatto. Matthew_hk t c 18:48, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You have been repeatedly, over a long period of time, warned about using edit summaries and citing your changes. You have continued to ignore these warnings and repeatedly add unsourced content to articles about living people. Giant Snowman 14:05, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ReaperSox (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made references but someone block me...

Decline reason:

I cannot unblock you at the present time. You most certainly have not cited your changes and you have most certainly not explained the rationale for your edits in edit summaries. You should set your preferences so that you cannot save an edit w/o and edit summary.That way you will not forget. Your saying that you have cited sources casts doubt on you understanding of why you were blocked. If you continue in this wise going forward, I fear you will again be blocked. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:06, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

And FYI - removing historical warnings after you have been blocked (no doubt in an attempt to make you look better) actually just makes you look worse... Giant Snowman 17:01, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ReaperSox (talk • contribs) 2018-07-26T18:43:51 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Damir Ceter

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.efe.com/efe/english/sports/cagliari-signs-colombian-striker-damir-ceter/50000266-3500216. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:39, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: Okok, Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ReaperSox (talk • contribs) 2018-07-31T20:42:46 (UTC)

August 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Francesco Acerbi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. please provide citation for the shirt number Matthew_hk t c 10:20, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Bukata

Please fill |title= with the original webpage title, not your fake one. Matthew_hk t c 11:08, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Matthew hk: Fine, Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ReaperSox (talk • contribs) 2018-08-01T15:16:25 (UTC)

August 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Alisson (footballer, born 1992). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:36, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cats

Hi. When updating clubs for footballers please remember to also add [[Category:Frosinone Calcio players]] for example to the bottom of the page, and update the squad template. Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 19:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please keep this in mind. I did it for you at Koffi Djidji. Robby.is.on (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Giant Snowman 14:49, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why????? WHY????? You serious? You've removed all the statistics updates without a reason, do not look at whether an update is true or not, you just delete it. Inconsistent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ReaperSox (talk • contribs) 17:04, 18 September 2018 (UTC)q[reply]

Hi @GiantSnowman:, I'm quite concerned about this block and the edits by this user that you've reverted. All the reverts that I've come across on my watchlist are for stats updates that appear to have been properly implemented; the dates in the infoboxes and career stats tables have all been updated and the figures appear to be in line with sources. If the block has been made on the basis of these edits, I believe it is wrongful. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 17:17, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Using one sample edit: Special:Diff/860039701, the table and timestamp were updated, but the edit summary was canned one. I would recommanded ReaperSox leaving something in the edit summary such as "update, using [soccerway or whatever the name of the database]". Matthew_hk t c 17:45, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mattythewhite: it was on the basis of edits like this and this - unsourced changes about BLPs, no edit summary either, and he has been warned/blocked for this before. Giant Snowman 19:20, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, although as the user has received only two warnings since their last block I'd have thought a L4 warning would have been more appropriate. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:30, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mattythewhite: because this user has been warned - and blocked - before, with no change in editing pattern. What good would a further warning have done? They have had more than enough. Giant Snowman 08:22, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I can understand. But why also remove the correct updates? At least restore them please. I spent some time there.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ReaperSox (talk) • contribs) 01:19, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You need to provide an explanation for your edits. Giant Snowman 10:10, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The modified statistics are all in line with the references.ReaperSox (talk) • contribs 12:48, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox dates

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions was not quite right. When updating statistics within the infobox of a footballer, please make sure you update the timestamp at the same time, so that both readers and fellow editors know when the information was last updated.

You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp within the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats, by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, Mattythewhite (talk) 00:44, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

After several warnings, you still don't update |club-update=. Why? SLBedit (talk) 17:02, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ReaperSox. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar

Hi there. When a player moves to a club, it should say "<player> joined <club>", not "joined to". Since yesterday, I have fixed this grammatical error in a few articles. Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:20, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Career stats table: Bartłomiej Drągowski

Hi Reaper, I note on the Bartłomiej Drągowski page that you've reverted a few edits on the career stats table back to the code for rowspan, rather than individual rows for each season. I can't find the discussion now but I just wanted to inform you - on the assumption that you were unaware - that concern was raised re: the readability when using rowspan in that particular manner. It is now common to use individual rows, as evidenced by the guide. Cheers, Liam E. Bekker (talk) 13:27, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. If you have such a source to verify the information you added to the Robert Murić article then please let me know and we can take a look at changing the article. Please let me know if you have any questions or queries. Thanks, Giant Snowman 12:16, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Exequiel Palacios, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page River Plate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:43, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Categories for leagues like [[Category:Serie A players]], which you added here don't get added to a player's article until the player has actually made an appearance in the league. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 07:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Gytkjær

Hey. Out of curiosity, where did you find that he will wear the number 9? Thanks, Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 12:04, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, I'm REDMAN 2019. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Juventus F.C., but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 11:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lorenzo Colombo

I noticed you’ve consistently edited Lorenzo Colombo’s goal tally to zero. He scored a goal yesterday against Bodo/Glint in the Europa league qualifiers. Didn’t you see the game or know about it?

Do you have a problem with Milan’s resurgence. Please desist from the alterations. Thank uou Temp (talk) 18:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC

indicates goals and appearances in the league, not in europe — Preceding unsigned comment added by ReaperSox (talk • contribs) 18:39, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Temp: To elaborate on what ReaperSox said: It's consensus among editors of football articles on Wikipedia (WP:FOOTY) not to include appearances other than those in the league in player infoboxes.

Also, please avoid comments such as "Do you have a problem with Milan’s resurgence", they violate assuming good faith, a fundamental principle on Wikipedia and are not helpful when discussing matters of this kind. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 23:06, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The only tally not added are goals scored in friendlies. Goal tally includes Qualifiers, leagues even the Club World Cup. The match against Bodo/Glint was his first official debut. It’s clearly stated. If what you say is correct, then Zlatan, CR7 and Messi should have at least 250 goals removed from their total goal tally. If the qualifiers don’t count, why does the number appearance(1) reflect? Be guided Temp (talk) 10:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Even Calhanoglu’s brace in the same match was added Temp (talk) 11:24, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Temp: Incorrect. We only count domestic league appearances and goals in the infobox. In fact, every footballers' infobox explicitly states this: https://jmp.sh/yG3WrwP

Colombo's only league appearances so far came last season which you can check in the player's career stats table.

For Messi, compare the numbers given in the infobox (485/444) and the total of league appearances and goals in the career stats table. Robby.is.on (talk) 11:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm Skitzouk. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Leicester City F.C. have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. pre season squad numbers are NOT official Jimmy Skitz's Answer Machine 23:31, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Mattythewhite (talk) 22:49, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beto (footballer, born 1998), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Campeonato de Portugal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Football Infobox

Please note that Infobox goals and appearances are for domestic league appearances only. I have reverted your edit for Christian Pulisic. Non-league stats are updated in the appropriate column of the Club Statistics Table. Froglife94 (talk) 19:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]