Talk:Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) thing(s).

Disability

Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organized Labour Low‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 August 2020 and 5 September 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mma011.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:07, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Section Added

Hello all! I have added a new section under "Legislative and Administrative History" titled "Section 14(c)". This focuses specifically on this portion of the FLSA and its impact on workers with disabilities. If you have any suggestions or comments, please let me know. Thanks! Mma011 (talk) 06:53, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Need to define Nominal vs. Real Value in the graph

The graph of Minimum Wage History displaying Real vs. Nominal Value in the graph has no key making it a bit difficult to read. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leeand00 (talk • contribs) 13:26, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

The article states:

On August 23, 2004, controversial changes to the FLSA's overtime laws went into effect,

My hazy recollection is that the FLSA was not amended, so this sentence is incorrect. It should say "... changes to Department of Labor regulations issued under the [authority of the] FLSA ..." if I am correct. 18.26.0.18 04:48, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

uncredentialed computer programmers?

I find the phrase:

... technical employees, such as computer programmers, who have a significant degree of specialized knowledge without formal academic credentials.

problematic as it seems to imply that most or all computer programmers lack "formal academic credentials"; a significant number do have relevant degrees.--Sommerfeld 17:44, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the comment of Sommerfeld. I have changed the article accordingly. Famspear 17:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Criminal provisions

Does anyone know if there are any criminal statutes included in the FLSA, i.e. the government can bring criminal actions against companies who grossly violate some provions? There are certainly civil provisions here - my hunch is that that is all that is present. Thanks for any help.

Borntostorm 23:32, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism Case

Fixed It. 2/09/07

overtime pay

I am currently working at a job where my first pay check was 74hrs. my employer pays me 12.00 and hour regualer pay 18.00 for time and a half.

my first pay check was staight pay with no over time pay. and now they are telling me that i'll will get a check but at 6.00 dollars and hour for th e overtime of 34 hours is this correct. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.177.69.162 (talk) 22:03, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links

I don't want to offend anyone, so let me ask here first. I have a blog that I update almost daily (although every so often I go out of pocket) that summarizes new published FLSA cases. That's overtimelaw.blogspot.com. I also am trying to create a wiki just for overtime, but it's in its infancy. Would it be OK to link to those sites in external links? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trtfsr (talk • contribs) 02:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Need to Define "Exempt" and "Non-exempt" Employee

This page redirects from a search on "Exempt Employee," yet it contains no definition. I suspect that there had been one, but someone edited it out.

There's a paragraph in the "Amendments" section about "FairPay" reclassifying employees but that's it. Katharine908 (talk) 17:11, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Katharine is absolutely correct -- Need to Define "Exempt" and "Non-exempt" Employee. Not only that, but define a covered (and uncovered?) "Exempt" and "Non-exempt" Employee. I am researching the status of salaried workers for a 501(c)(3), and was very disappointed that there is no mention of salaried workers. Logically, this would mean that they are exempt from FLSA, but the US Code is not known for its logical consistency. Better luck next time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.32.166.233 (talk) 01:45, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Employees whose jobs are covered by the FLSA are either exempt of non-exempt. Non-exempt workers and entitled to overtime pay whil exempt workers are not entitled to overtime pay.^[1]

References

^ [FLSA home page. "Coverage Under the FLSA"]. Kaufman and Jones. Retrieved 8 March 2012. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)

last paragraph under amendments

lacks factual basis and refers to reporting time pay which applies at a state to state level (a.e. in california if you are scheduled to work 9-5 and get sent home at 3 you get 2 extra hours of work but in michigan you get a "sorry we don't need you see you tomarrow" from your employer — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.61.157.76 (talk) 12:01, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Portal-to-Portal Act description needs to be updated to reflect Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk

Current text from Fair Labor Standards Act Amendments:

"...as long as an employee is engaging in activities that benefit the employer [...] the employer has an obligation to pay the employee for his or her time"

However, the recent "Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk" decision indicates that...

"[...] it matters not that an employer requires an activity; the activity must be 'indispensable' and 'tied to the productive work' that the employee is hired to do.'"^[1]

because...

"If that were the test, Justice Thomas wrote, it would sweep into the realm of paid employment the very kind of activities that Congress had enacted the Portal-to-Portal Act, passed in 1947 to narrow the scope of wage and hour rights under the Fair Labor Standards Act, to address."^[2]

The decision resolved that a required security screening, while benefiting the employer, was not a covered obligation for reimbursement because the screening could be removed without effecting the productive work the employees were hired for. Philippe23 (talk) 15:24, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

Some historical citations needed

These two sentences from the section on the Equal Pay Act need citations:

"In the past, it had been generally accepted that women did not deserve to earn as much money as men because they were not heads of households. However, in many homes, women were in fact the sole breadwinner for various reasons, ranging from death or disability of a spouse to divorce or single parenthood."

As much as we all know there was discrimination historically, this is still an encyclopedia, and we need fact based citations to support commonly held political views in this context. Added {Citations needed} to each sentence to reflect this.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fair Labor Standards Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060926150028/http://www.usda.gov/nass/graphics/data/fl_allwg.txt to http://www.usda.gov/nass/graphics/data/fl_allwg.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:13, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Policy Analysis - Summer Session22

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 August 2022 and 4 September 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Faithegunn (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Faithegunn (talk) 00:06, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revised 2009/2013 Paid Vacation Act Section

Hi all! I have removed the original written work under the 2009/2013 Paid Vacation Act section due to a lack of references. I then added in two paragraphs with more information regarding the proposed amendment. I went into more detail about the contents and source of the bill as well as the most recent actions by the House of Representatives. If anything seems amiss, please let me know! Thank you! -- Faithegunn (talk) 03:51, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mandatory drug test

Does an employer have to pay an employee to do this 172.56.223.29 (talk) 07:38, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] [FLSA home page. "Coverage Under the FLSA"]. Kaufman and Jones. Retrieved 8 March 2012. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)

[2] ttps://www.npr.org/2014/12/09/369671004/supreme-court-rules-employers-are-not-required-to-pay-for-security-time

[3] ttps://www.scotusblog.com/2014/12/no-overtime-pay-for-after-work-security-check/

[1]

[1]

[2]