Talk:Conway criterion
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Hexagonal tilings
[edit]There may be some hexagonal tilings for examples here: Hexagonal_tiling#Topologically_identical_tilings Tom Ruen (talk) 00:59, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Questionable use of a golygon
[edit]Perhaps the golygon picture should be replaced with a better picture? My only complaints with the golygon picture are that most people don't know what a golygon is and that golygon-(ality?) has nothing to do with the Conway criterion.
104.228.101.152 (talk) 07:36, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- It's especially confusing to this novice, as the text discusses hexagons but the illustration shows an 8-sided figure. Another element that I found confusing - "each of the boundary parts BC, CD, EF, and FA is centrosymmetric—that is, each one is congruent to itself when rotated by 180-degrees around its midpoint" - isn't any line segment going to be congruent to itself when rotated 180-degrees around its midpoint? Thanks for any clarification. PurpleChez (talk) 18:57, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Conway criterion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120706175448/http://www.mathforamerica.org/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=11&name=DLFE-103.pdf to http://www.mathforamerica.org/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=11&name=DLFE-103.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 12 August 2017 (UTC)