Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blaze park
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Housing estates are generally non-notable except in certain exceptional circumstances (i.e. Broadwater Farm). This single line of text certainly asserts no notability. Black Kite 23:11, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Blaze park (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete nn public housing complex, unsourced with no indication of notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:37, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Agree with Carlossuarez46 (talk · contribs), notability is not established, article is unsourced WP:OR and does not assert notability or provide references that do. Cirt (talk) 23:16, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NN. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 00:03, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 14:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Kingswinford. While I generally give geographic locations a free pass in deletions, this just doesn't have enough info in it to help a reader at all. Until it does, best to have it as part of an article on a larger area.--Fabrictramp (talk) 14:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete definitely not notable and probably will never be. Red Phoenix (Talk) 01:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.