Talk:Pac-Man Museum+

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

The subjectiveness of "classic" and "modern" games.

I think that whatever is a "classic" game, and a "modern" game is subjective. Let me explain. So, someone was born in 1987 and thinks "Super Mario World" is a classic game, and another person born in 2001 thinks "Dance Dance Revolution (DDR)" is a classic game. One would argue that DDR is a modern game, while the other would object. This is what I'm talking about! Any other people who think my change should get published? EditorPedia94 (talk) 18:28, 11 December 2022 (UTC) EditorPedia94 (talk) 03:33, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this Museum +?

Why is this Museum + and not Museum+? Every source used calls it Museum+, with the sole exception of the Nintendo World Report review. Is this a MOS thing? detria^skies 22:22, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the common name and the official name (ex.) leave out the space, I think we sould, too. IceWelder [✉] 19:00, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the original move reason. It seems not to be true anymore? Three is a quorum in favor of moving IMO. Axem Titanium (talk) 20:32, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 March 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Moved as proposed. Consensus is clear. BD2412 T 00:35, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pac-Man Museum + → Pac-Man Museum+ – WP:COMMONNAME and WP:OFFICIALNAME, Originally moved from "Museum+" to "Museum +" because of a few official social media posts using "Museum +", which should not have been done as Bandai Namco themselves flip flopped between using "Museum +" and "Museum+" when the game was first announced and being released, as can be seen by searching Museum on Bandai Namco's US Twitter account. Every post on the official Pac-Man twitter account used "Museum+", with the sole exception of one, which given it was in a series of similarly formatted tweets, was most likely a typo. Additionally, 19 sources on the article in question use "Museum+", while only the Nintendo World Report citation uses "Museum +" detria^skies 18:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. There really is no reason for it to be at this title. QuicoleJR (talk) 19:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support - per nomination. I agree with this assessment.

aaronneallucas (talk) 03:28, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination as I don't see why it should be the current name, all the evidence points to the suggested name. Captain Galaxy 20:17, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per the nominator's rationale. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 20:52, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.