Talk:.design
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the .design article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Sources
[edit]- http://money.cnn.com/2012/06/13/technology/icann-domain-names/
- http://domainincite.com/13285-todays-new-gtld-withdrawals-play-and-design
- http://www.eurekamagazine.co.uk/design-engineering-news/design-domain-names-released/83932/
- https://www.centralnic.com/company/news/2014/centralnic-group-wins-hotly-contested-top-level-domain-battle
http://domainnamewire.com/2015/05/12/this-weeks-new-tlds-design-and-four-early-access/- http://www.webdesignermag.co.uk/designing-a-new-domain/
- http://domainnamewire.com/2014/09/25/top-level-design-wins-design-contention-set/
http://www.thedomains.com/2015/05/14/design-winds-up-with-over-5k-domain-registrations-after-1st-day/- http://www.thedomains.com/2015/05/16/ceo-of-design-on-redesigning-the-success-of-a-new-gtld-launch/
---Another Believer (Talk) 19:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
COI
[edit]In accordance with Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, I have chosen to disclose that I have a personal connection to this subject. But, my main purpose in writing this article is to benefit Wikipedia and its mission. I believe this article is written from a neutral perspective, is sourced appropriately, and has been constructed from independent, reliable sources. The second link above provides the following summary, which I believe I have followed appropriately:
- Be transparent about your conflict of interest (
Done) - Subjects require significant coverage in independent reliable sources. ( Done)
- Your role is to inform and reference, not promote or sell. ( Done)
- Be extremely cautious about the risks of editing articles about yourself or your clients ( Done)
- If writing a draft, write without bias, as if you don't work for the company or personally know the subject. ( Done)
- State facts and statistics, don't be vague or general. ( Done)
- Take time to get sources and policy right. ( Done)
- Get neutral, uninvolved, disinterested editors to review your draft. (
Doing...) - Work with the community and we'll work with you. ( Doing...)
- Communicate, communicate, communicate. ( Doing...)
My ultimate goal is to promote this article to Good or Featured status. I understand this will require review and assistance from other members of the community, which is great. I invite all to examine this article carefully to make sure the content is fair and accurate. I have experience promoting COI articles to Good or Featured status, including this one, this one, this one and this one. Feel free to contact me if you have any concerns. ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:03, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
COI tag (January 2023)
[edit]Creator and editor has COI to Ray King and created their bio, company page, and this page and others connected to the company. KeepItGoingForward (talk) 07:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- Yup! Editors are welcome to identify non-neutral or otherwise problematic text. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:45, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- @HapHaxion: Thanks for updating the template above and please let me know if you identify any problematic content or wish to help with removing the tag. Thanks again and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- @KeepItGoingForward: Since you're happy with the Talk page templates now, can you remove the "close connection" tag? ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:03, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for removing the tag, Equine-man. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:16, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- @KeepItGoingForward: Since you're happy with the Talk page templates now, can you remove the "close connection" tag? ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:03, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- @HapHaxion: Thanks for updating the template above and please let me know if you identify any problematic content or wish to help with removing the tag. Thanks again and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
@Equine-man, User:KeepItGoingForward, I'm also seeking removal of the COI tags at .design, .gay, and .wiki, if you're able to help. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:53, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Update tag
[edit]@HapHaxion: I see you've added an 'update' tag to this article. Here are some sources re: GoDaddy:
- https://domainnamewire.com/2021/07/26/godaddy-finishes-takeover-of-club-19-more-mmx-domains/
- https://domainnamewire.com/2022/03/04/porkbun-moves-expiry-stream-to-godaddy-auctions/
- https://domainnamewire.com/2021/04/07/godaddy-to-acquire-mmx-club-design/
Do you have any interest in resolving the tag by adding a quick update to the article? ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:05, 13 January 2023 (UTC)