User talk:Yvwv

Welcome!

Hello, Yvwv, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! FloNight ^talk 20:11, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Freemasonry in Sweden

Why starting a page on a topic if you have absolutely nothing to say, beyond making a placeholder for an interwiki-link? u p p l a n d 08:48, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great call on Northern Wars

Hey I noticed the revert between you and Y on my watchlist. I see for some reason most of the articles include both wars, but the danish version for example, doesn't seem to mention the war in 1665. Another example is the Dutch. Besides that, most of the articles have very little mention of the 1665 war, and instead only include a bit of background info. Shouldn't these links be removed and left with only the articles on the 1665 war. Falphin 22:26, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yvwv was right! I stand corrected. Williamborg 02:08, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Knittel

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Knittel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Knittel. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 24fan24 00:54, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I've removed the delete tag and replaced it with the {{move to Wiktionary}} tag. It's more appropriate. --Tuspm ^{Talk | Contribs | E-Mail Me} 01:37, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

COTW Project

You voted for Textile, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. Davodd 02:03, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Post-war Sweden

Hej Yww, jag har skrivit till en del och redigerat språket litet på din artikel om Sveriges moderna historia. Har lämnat det mesta av din text oförändrad men gjort vissa omdisponeringar av bitar här och där för att göra strukturen tydligare och sätta in utvecklingen i Sverige i ett klarare internationellt sammanhang. Jag har lagt till en del också, mest om 70-80-talen (t ex om Fälldinregeringarna, IB och U-137); jag planerar en artikel om 80-talets ubåtsjakter, den finns som röd länk i texten.

Ta en titt och se vad du tycker. Strausszek September 10, 2006 01:05 (CEST)

Military history Collaboration of the Fortnight

You supported Warrior, which has been selected as the Military history WikiProject's new Collaboration of the Fortnight. Please help improve this article to featured article standards. Kirill Lokshin 00:26, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

adding request in the swedish wikipedia

Hi, yes sorry for that, i was looking for the swedish version of de:Wikipedia:Übersetzungswünsche or Wikipedia:Translation into English, (translation requests), so i had to put them on (requests for articles). I was hoping some nice wikipedian would come by and would add the four swedish names for it. that should fix it. my question: is there a translator page in the swedish wikipedia ? , cheers. Mion 11:30, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Industry is now the Core Topics COTF

You showed support for Amazon rainforest at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics/Core topics COTF. This article was selected as our collaboration. Hope you can help.

History of textiles

is a redlink - is there such an article- I do hope so! Johnbod 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There should be, but apparently there isn't. /Yvwv 23:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

well unless you intend writiung one in the near future I would remove the link! Johnbod 23:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tjeckisk historia

Are you sure this is the right Wikipedia for Tjeckisk historia ? Cheers, Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:39, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was supposed for Swedish Wikipedia, but somehow it ended up here. /Yvwv 16:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ship transport

Hi, I am in the process of trying to find articles to link with a new australian maritime history project - and I am finding the heirarchy of water transport articles a bit like a hollow log. What could be the main articles are stub class and quality - I am also quite bothered by the fact that what could be a 'lead article' is so limited in its title - as 'ship' is very militing - I looked at the history of the ship transport article - and thought I'd ask you what you'd think about a change - what do you think? SatuSuro 02:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of boy bands

I've nominated List of boy bands, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that List of boy bands satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of boy bands and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of boy bands during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Blueboy 96 16:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Marine architecture

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Marine architecture, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Marine architecture is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Marine architecture, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 06:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Toilet history in Outhouse

You were kind enough to put in a link to Toilet History. I did move it, but didn't change it. Unfortunately, when I click on the link it doesn't seem to go anywhere. Could you please figure out what you want, so we can have a more effective linke, and put it in.

Thank you.

7&6=thirteen 20:41, 4 December 2007 (UTC)Stan[reply]

Corf

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Corf, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:59, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Police radio

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Police radio, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:02, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Explorer Vodka

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Explorer Vodka, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Explorer Vodka. Shell ^babelfish 17:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pot-holder

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pot-holder, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Pot-holder. Redfarmer (talk) 14:28, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Pung Kuk EDM Wire Manufacturing Co.

A tag has been placed on Pung Kuk EDM Wire Manufacturing Co. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Vianello (talk) 08:52, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WP:Sims

Hello Yvwv. You have been invited to join WikiProject Sims, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the Sims-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits within the scope of the project. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of project members. You may also wish to add {{User WP Sims 1}} or {{User WP Sims 2}} to your userpage.

HereFord 02:01, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vital list

I saw you had previously proposed a great swap, which I don't think ever happened. What is going on with this? I am currently interested in making some changes to the list mainly in the biography section. Currently, over 10% of the most important people listed are mathematician???!!!!! Also of the 115, 30 are not included in the 200 Category:Top-priority biography articles. Currently, with the overabundance of mathameticians and absence of athletes I am seeking comment on the four most vital people from Kurt Gödel, David Hilbert, Henri Poincaré, Alan Turing, Jackie Robinson, Jesse Owens, Muhammad Ali, Pelé, and Michael Jordan.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 17:59, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of I Like the Flowers

An article that you have been involved in editing, I Like the Flowers, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Like the Flowers. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 21:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Comparison of The Sims 2 expansion packs

I have nominated Comparison of The Sims 2 expansion packs, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of The Sims 2 expansion packs. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 00:59, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You could probably copy it to the the Sims Wiki if you wanted. -LtNOWIS (talk) 07:39, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Autistic spectre listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Autistic spectre. Since you had some involvement with the Autistic spectre redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Eubulides (talk) 17:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Underground to Canada

The article Underground to Canada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources or demonstration of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Durova³¹⁴ 04:35, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of YIMBY

An article that you have been involved in editing, YIMBY, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YIMBY. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nsaa (talk) 13:28, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barber chair

Please explain why you started an article with essentially no content and based on zero sources. This does nothing to help the reader gain reliable information about barbers' or hairdressers' chairs; all it does it fill in a redlink, but this is a minimal achievement. My point is, please don't start this kind of microstub in future. Do some research on the topic or else leave starting pages to those who are able to contribute useful content. Fences&Windows 14:14, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will ignore your comment. Wikipedia is built on stubs. /Yvwv (talk) 15:16, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Long boom / Golden Age of Capitalism / Post-World War II economic boom

Hi Yvwv,

Thanks for your extensive work at Long boom / Golden Age of Capitalism / Post-World War II economic boom!

The "Golden Age" and "Post-War" articles cover, to my eye, the same phenomenon, and hence would benefit from being merged, though there is some question as to what title should be used for the combined article -- you argue (correctly, to my eye) that "Post-War" is more neutral, though others argue (also correctly) that "Golden Age" is widely used. I've started a discussion at Talk:Golden Age of Capitalism#Merge Post-World War II, which I reckon you'd be interested in contributing to.

—Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 22:08, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About User:Thobiah/TAR

Didn't see your comment in the talk section. ;)
That user page isn't a hoax, it's my very own versions that I've created myself in my computer. :) Thobiah (talk) 15:55, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of firsts

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of firsts, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of firsts. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ecphora (talk) 19:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Yvwv! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 379 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Roger Wallis - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Vávra Suk - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Michael Moore (Swedish officer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thomas Dennerby - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Big in Japan (format)

The article Big in Japan (format) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The shows are notable not the person that created the format.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ridernyc (talk) 15:18, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Big in Japan (format)

I have nominated Big in Japan (format), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big in Japan (format). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ridernyc (talk) 21:48, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:37, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Four boxes for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Four boxes, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four boxes until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Evil saltine (talk) 01:53, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Monique Wadsted

The article Monique Wadsted has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

being a lawyer isn't notable - representing Scientology in a case isn't notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Scott Mac 20:00, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lennart Koskinen

The article Lennart Koskinen has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 14:32, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Shortest river, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sehmeet singh Talk 16:37, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jason Rouse

The article Jason Rouse has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bgwhite (talk) 18:57, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rain tax

The article Rain tax has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The contents if this article are not supported by either of its references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ian Spackman (talk) 11:14, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited History of the firearm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sear (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Diplomatic immunity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Legal immunity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Balconette bra

An article that you have been involved in editing, Balconette bra, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. — btphelps ^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:41, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, History of hides

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, History of hides. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Hide (skin). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Hide (skin) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 10:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited History of hide materials, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Yvwv, I've left you a message at your talk page on the Swedish Wikipedia. jonkerz ♠talk 05:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Business idea

The article Business idea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources or evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NebY (talk) 08:51, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clausewitz Engine

The article Clausewitz Engine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Miniscule article with just two lines of text without really providing useful information.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Denniss (talk) 11:05, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Entrenching tool, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rampart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nobility (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Eminence

Pachacuti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to National hero

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States military chocolate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sundry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Military drums, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Applause (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Heckling

Demoralization (warfare) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Surrender

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Demoralization (warfare) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Retreat

Straight man (stock character) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Eccentric

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Future self

Hello Yvwv,

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a deletion discussion about the redirect Future self. If you're interested in participating in this discussion, please leave your comments here Thanks, Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 18:35, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited War sand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Normandy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited QI (I series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chilli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Modern pagans listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Modern pagans. Since you had some involvement with the Modern pagans redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). —Sowlos 12:51, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Future Korean War for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Future Korean War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future Korean War until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - ☣Tourbillon ^A ? 08:26, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dystopia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Running Man (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Maritime timeline may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:40, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scottish independence referendum, 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holyrood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eavesdrop for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eavesdrop is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eavesdrop until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Codename Lisa (talk) 21:21, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Executive apartment for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Executive apartment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Executive apartment until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. IagoQnsi (talk) 23:19, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Teracom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terrestrial broadcast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sift

The article Sift has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The definition of "sift" is adequately given in Wiktionary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. : Noyster (talk), 14:05, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Inheritance tax, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Retroactive. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mobile building

The article Mobile building has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Comes across as a dictionary term.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 21:07, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Long-time nuclear waste warning messages

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Long-time nuclear waste warning messages. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waste_Isolation_Pilot_Plant#Warning_messages_for_future_humans. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waste_Isolation_Pilot_Plant#Warning_messages_for_future_humans – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 14:00, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Relocation of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sealand. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Parking Day for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parking Day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parking Day until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 22:50, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James M. Clash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James M. Clash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James M. Clash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 13:55, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

World team listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect World team. Since you had some involvement with the World team redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. LukeSurl^{t c} 15:08, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Homosexuality in the Batman franchise for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Homosexuality in the Batman franchise is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homosexuality in the Batman franchise until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KoshVorlon 13:07, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fonus

Hello Yvwv,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fonus for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TimothyJosephWood 20:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fonus

Hello Yvwv,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fonus for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TimothyJosephWood 18:20, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Yvwv. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Algonet

The article Algonet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:45, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The gift that keeps on giving

Any chance this article can be improved? Otherwise it's probably deletable. Felsic2 (talk) 17:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Last Night in Sweden for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Last Night in Sweden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Last Night in Sweden until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 14:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The gift that keeps on giving for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The gift that keeps on giving is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The gift that keeps on giving until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Felsic2 (talk) 15:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hubbabba listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hubbabba. Since you had some involvement with the Hubbabba redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 20:49, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Yvwv. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Snopp dogg listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Snopp dogg. Since you had some involvement with the Snopp dogg redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 14:52, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Yvwv. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Spottan" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Spottan. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 5#Spottan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TheAwesome Hwyh 19:20, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clubwear

The article Clubwear has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:DICDEF. (Already cited in Wiktionary, where it belongs.)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 04:34, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Monique Wadsted for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monique Wadsted is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monique Wadsted until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North8000 (talk) 03:05, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Cooking plate" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Cooking plate and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 19#Cooking plate until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Tigraan^{Click here for my talk page ("private" contact)} 11:40, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Unionism (North Ireland)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Unionism (North Ireland) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 7#Unionism (North Ireland) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Heanor (talk) 19:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Materials physics

The article Materials physics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This stub is just the definition of a terminology, which is not suitable scope for an encyclopedia article (WP:NOTDICT). Expanding the article would be redundant since there are already articles for materials science and solid-state physics. Delete and redirect to materials science.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 〈 Forbes₇₂ | Talk 〉 20:53, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of the shortest rivers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of the shortest rivers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the shortest rivers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alverado (talk) 07:56, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the notice going to the wrong person...

... Hope you have a good day! Skynxnex (talk) 01:40, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Industrial labour" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Industrial labour has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 22 § Industrial labour until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 22:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Axis victory in world war ii" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Axis victory in world war ii has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 3 § Axis victory in world war ii until a consensus is reached. Dicklyon (talk) 02:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]