Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yeomanry Cavalry (disambiguation)

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. No consensus established after multiple relistings. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 03:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeomanry Cavalry (disambiguation)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page had been converted to a redirect to Yeomanry Cavalry until today, when I reverted it back to bring it to AfD. At its previous state, it was eligible for WP:G14; however, with the history of the page that I brough back in its current state, I was wondering what consensus would be on what to do with this. Redirecting to Yeomanry Cavalry seems to be an issue as that page is not a disambiguation page or serving a similar function. TartarTorte 19:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. TartarTorte 19:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a set index page. Also: don't edit pages just so you can bring them to AfD. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My bad. I was trying to follow the spirit of WP:BLAR, but did so incorrect. As it seems that in this instance, it would have been best to have just reverted it to the state it's currently in and left it without bringing it to AfD. I'll be sure to be better in the future about that. TartarTorte 15:54, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, even though it was a waste of everyone's time to drag its carcass here. Set indices and dab pages are not for partial matches. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a set index page. // Timothy :: talk 13:44, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more time.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 05:25, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Per WP:SETINDEX, a set index is "a list of items of a specific type that share the same name" (bolding mine), for example HMS Audacious. Canterbury Yeomanry Cavalry and Rutland Yeomanry Cavalry do not. You don't see 1st Armored Division (United States), 2nd Armored Division (United States), 3rd Armored Division (United States), etc. in Armored Division (disambiguation). Clarityfiend (talk) 15:27, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.