Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kira Breed-Wrisley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:00, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kira Breed-Wrisley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although the article asserts that Kira Breed-Wrisley's "works have won awards from the Ivy Film Festival and the Syracuse International Film Festival, among others," it provides no references for any awards. A more substantial narrative and better references are needed to establish notability. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:47, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:05, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:06, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:31, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:59, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.