User talk:Nato James

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

October 2019

Hello, I'm Zinnober9. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Tolichowki seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Zinnober9 (talk) 03:09, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nato James, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Nato James! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Malakpet, you may be blocked from editing. David Biddulph (talk) 18:49, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 12:47, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nato James (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear @User:Widr, I was born and raised in Malakpet. Few elements do not like to see the reality. I know Malakpet in and out. Please do not revert back the facts that I've mentioned on the Malakpet page. I want to mention further that if you do not trust those facts then please get it verified then publish the changes. Thanks for your understanding.Nato James (talk) 14:27, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. The burden is on you to include reliable sources when adding content to articles. We aren't just going to allow you to post your personal knowledge to articles. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:14, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.