Talk:Trou de loup

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Image replaced

I've just replaced the old image, so I'm removing the {{Reqdiagram}} tag. Let me know if there are any problems. -- Sakurambo 14:57, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Trou de loup and punji stick

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

closed by the proposer

"It has been suggested that punji stick be merged into Trou de loup". I suggest a merger the other way Trou de loup into punji stick as punji stick is the more recent name and has been used in more recent conflicts. -- PBS (talk) 11:29, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Past tense

Should this be referred to strictly in the past tense as a historical relic? It might be antiquated, but its usage in Vietnam demonstrates it still can see modern use, particularly in irregular warfare. 108.34.203.123 (talk) 00:29, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]