Jump to content

Talk:The Veils

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Inaccurances

THIS PAGE IS RIDDLED WITH INACCURACIES AND SHOULD BE DELETED UNTIL CORRECTED..

well why dont u correct them instead of just complaining abought it.

Fair use rationale for Image:Aveils logo.jpg

Image:Aveils logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

fair use alternative?

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:NUX VOMICA COVER.jpg

Image:NUX VOMICA COVER.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Ping-Ponging

Please refrain from using words whose meaning may not be found in a dictionary nor words you make up without a clear meaning. Remember, this is an international accepted encyclopedia, whose content is regularly used in scholastic works! The word 'ping-ponging' has no International acceptable meaning nor is it defined in an accepted English dictionary. Freshymail-user_talk:fngosa--the-knowledge-defender 14:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Veils. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:50, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Veils. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:37, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Genres

The genres removed from the infobox had objectively been reliably sourced. There was no justification for removing them to leave only indie rock because an editor does not agree with the sources. RockabillyRaccoon (talk) 15:32, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

-- none of these sources describe the band as a gothic rock band --FMSky (talk) 15:51, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they pretty clearly do. RockabillyRaccoon (talk) 16:14, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What FMSky is attempting to convey is that playing a gothic-rock song does not make a group a gothic-rock band. They are taking a very strict interpretation of wikipedia policy on synthesis, in that articles should only reflect what is explicitly stated by a source or conclusions that would be made by any sensible reader (e.g. 2+2=4). Whether or not playing x music makes a group an x band is, I think, a question without an answer as genre is itself a matter of interpretation, and labels such as those have no metric for veracity, but I digress. I think you two need to endeavor to cooperate, and not compete. GabberFlasted (talk) 18:08, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Veils&oldid=1201600481"