Talk:Rizal Day

Changing the day of commemoration

The article actually says that the commemoration day was changed in 2011 but there is no certitude whether this change is permanent. This is arguably since the declaration of a special no work day for June 20th is done due to the fact that the official day, June 19th, on Sunday falls. According to the Sunstar's article, source cited in the article, there's absolutely no declaration of June 20th as an official Holiday. Can this please be changed. 112.201.130.191 (talk) 02:29, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

If there was confusion, you misread the statement. Nothing in the statement said it was replacing the December 30 holiday. It just said that there was a special non-working holiday on June 20, 2011. The complete date means it is non-recurring. I've added the phrase "one-time" to further emphasize the point that it did not replace the December 30 observance (there was still Rizal Day in December 30, 2011). –HTD 12:30, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

10:51, 30 December 2012 (UTC)~~This article does give the readers a better view of the National Holiday of Philippines. As far as I can see , Rizal Day has been through a lot of changes ,and people in Philippine gives lots of respect and concern into it.However ,I think other than the facts about the Rizal Day. would it be better if the editor could cite more about the origin and stories about the special day? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delphijane (talk • contribs)

The origin has been expounded already, and although I'd imagine there'd be more stories, if these relate to Rizal himself this should go to the Jose Rizal article, not here. –HTD 12:30, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rizal Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120308165946/http://www.nhi.gov.ph/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=617 to http://www.nhi.gov.ph/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=617
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.gmanews.tv/100days/story/194762/a-brief-history-of-presidential-inaugurations
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090623142030/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20090620-211540/Rizal-Day-to-move-from-Dec-30-to-June-19 to http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20090620-211540/Rizal-Day-to-move-from-Dec-30-to-June-19

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC)