Talk:Radio Row

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Reason for decline

I removed part of the lede that suggested the rise of transistors led to the decline of radio rows in many cities. There is no source for this claim and I find it dubious. Of course, as the article says, the demise of radio row in NYC was the direct result of its demolition to make way for the World Trade Center. Canal St. didn't have the density of vendors and side streets that made Radio Row so interesting. Leeds Radio on Vesey St had a surplus electric chair on display for many years in the late 50s or early 60s. (Google tells me they are still in business -- in Brooklyn, http://www.leedsradio.com .) I know less about other cities, but the transistor did not destroy the hobby electronics market, far from it. Instead, I suspect what happened to individual radio parts retailers mirrors what happened to other sectors of retailing in the same time frame: the rise of shopping centers, national chains and mail order. The Lafayette Radio and Radio Shack chains emerged in this era and the later is still going strong. Credit cards made mail order feasible for small quantities of specialty items like electronics parts. Kit vendors like Heathkit reduced the need for hobbiests to buy individual parts. The electronics hobby has shifted from radio to computers and robotics, but it's still going strong. My local MicroCenter has a large home brew computer department. The MIT amateur radio club holds an electronics flea market here in Cambridge, Mass. the third Sunday of each month from April to October, and it feels very similar to my regular trips to Cortland St when I was a kid (no electric chair, but an Enigma and other cipher machines are often on display). --agr (talk) 20:03, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Time for a comeback?

With the return of vacuum tube fans, the decline of radio shack as a source of electronics components, and the new interest in electronics hobbyists, are these kind of business clusters (focused on surplus electronics and electronic components) likely to return?

Norton surplus exists in Los Angeles for fans of vintage Apollo-era hardware, and Ohio has a few electronics dealerships, as well as emerging hackerspaces rhyre (talk) 20:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Radio Row. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160728141918/http://gothamist.com/2016/07/25/radio_row_history.php to http://gothamist.com/2016/07/25/radio_row_history.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Berger's Quote

The quote attributed Meyer Berger is from the introduction by Pete Hamill. Born in 1898, Berger would've been an adult by the time radio row became a thing. CrinklyCrunk (talk) 00:49, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]