Jump to content

Talk:Peter Longerich

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Original research

Regarding this text, removed from the article to here:

Peter Longerich's scholarship & honesty was exposed by [[David Irving]] when Longerich submitted an expert report and appeared as a defence witness at the 2000 [[Irving v. Lipstadt|Irving vs. Penguin & Lipstadt trial]]. In his report Longerich claimed: ''"The SS invented the expression "annihilation through labour" (Vernichtung durch Arbeit) for this method of exploiting people to the point of death."''<ref>The Systematic Character of the National Socialist Policy for the Extermination of the Jews: Electronic Edition, by Heinz Peter Longerich. Part V: The machinery of mass murder in full operation (1942-1944). Subsection: 7. http://www.hdot.org/en/trial/defense/pl2/V</ref> And claimed under oath: "... they started in the concentration camps a programme which they called "extermination through work"."<ref>Trial transcript. Day 25. Page 23/4: http://www.hdot.org/en/trial/transcripts/day25/pages21-25</ref> When pressed by Irving for a wartime source for such a claim, Longerich finally admitted: "Maybe it was mistake,"<ref>Trial transcript. Day 25. Page 57. http://hdot.org/en/trial/transcripts/day25/pages56-60</ref>

This is original research. None of the sources linked say anything about "Longerich's scholarship & honesty", it's a synthesis of those sources, an original interpretation of those sources. Whoever wrote this appears to be out to sully Longerich's reputation by calling him dishonest and a poor scholar. See WP:BLP. One could just as easily interpret this not as a lie, but simply a minor mistake on Longerich's part while acting as an expert witness, which is hardly notable. Anyway, no source for this. Per WP:BLP, it requires a high degree of verification per WP:RS. Green Cardamom (talk) 17:38, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]