Talk:Mark 46 torpedo

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mark 46 torpedo article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Maritime / Technology / Weaponry

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Infobox?

The appropriate infobox is {{Infobox Weapon}} -MBK₀₀₄ 02:34, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Operators Map

Given that the Mark 46 is being retired from US Navy service in 2015, I find it highly unlikely that it has been universally retired (as of 11/26/2015). — Preceding unsigned comment added by NorwayStorm (talk • contribs) 18:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What about Poland?

What about Poland, with its "Oliver Hazard Perry" class frigates? Those have torpedo tubes, and ASROC missiles, and Seahawk helicopters that carry Mk-46s. They also have SM-1MR and Harpoon missiles, but these and the ASROCS are all fired by the one launcher from a 40-missile magazine.47.215.180.7 (talk) 08:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

in service until 2015?

Where did "remained in service until 2015" come from? It's not in the cited source. Kendall-K1 (talk) 01:50, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]