Jump to content

Talk:Dan Lipinski

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.


Request edit

In full disclosure I am a staffer for Congressman Lipinski. I have a few requests for additional information to be displayed on his page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Lipinski. I had been working with one of the page's editors but he told me he's been very busy and hasn't responded in a while. Please note I am not trying to promote the Congressman, but trying to portray a more accurate and well-rounded picture of him.

The congressman's page is focused almost entirely on his record on socially conservative issues. There are very few mentions of issues where he is more traditionally aligned with the Democratic Party. I think it's important to add some of these so readers know why he's a Democrat and why he has voted with his party 87% of the time since's he's been in Congress. [1]

For one thing, he is a stalwart environmentalist and introduced the first carbon fee bill 10 years ago [2]

He also has a lifetime score of 90% from the league of conservation voters. [3]

On gun issues, he has a F from the NRA. [4]

He has also been a longtime supporter of unions and the labor movement and has a 91% lifetime rating from the AFL_CIO [5]

While it's certainly fair to point out his positions on hot button issues like abortion and same sex marriage, I think it's equally fair to also point out his position on another hot button issue like the environment.

It seems incomplete to only highlight his positions on abortion, Barack Obama (?), the economy, foreign policy (which only covers Hong Kong), Healthcare, Immigration (he voted for the DREAM act earlier this month but there's no mention of that [6]) and LGBTQ issues (He also voted for the Equality Act last month but there's no mention [7]).

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I appreciate your consideration. Lipinskistaff (talk) 19:07, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

Reply 14-JUN-2019

  Unable to review  

  • To expedite your request, please provide the desired claims in the form of verbatim statements as they ought to appear in the article. These verbatim claims can only be fully evaluated once they are shown native to how they are intended to be seen in the article. The exact locations where the desired claims are to be placed should also be described, as well as the properly formatted references using the citation style already in use with the article, as shown in the example below:
Example edit request

Please add the following claim, as the third sentence of the second paragraph of the Sun section:

  • The Sun's diameter is estimated to be approximately 864,337 miles in length.<ref>{{cite journal|last1= Harinath|first1= Paramjit|title= Size of the Sun|journal= Science|issue= 78|volume= 51|url= http://www.journalsource.com|date= 2019|page= 46}}</ref>


(Which displays as):
  • The Sun's diameter is estimated to be approximately 864,337 miles in length.[1]


References


  1. ^ Harinath, Paramjit. (2019). "Size of the Sun", Science, 51(78):46.
  • Kindly open a new edit request at your earliest convenience when ready to proceed.
Regards,  Spintendo  20:06, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request edit

In full disclosure I am a staffer for Congressman Lipinski. I am following up on my request for additional information to be displayed on his page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Lipinski. Please note I am not trying to promote the Congressman, but attempting to reflect a more accurate and well-rounded picture of him.


Please add the following claim, as the fourth sentence of the third paragraph of the opening section:

Despite his social conservatism, Lipinski is more traditionally aligned with the Democratic Party on most issues and has voted with his party 87% of the time since he's been in Congress. [1]


Please add the following claim, as the fifth sentence of the third paragraph of the opening section:

Lipinski has a lifetime score of 90% from the league of conservation voters [2], an F grade from the NRA [3], and a 91% lifetime rating from the AFL-CIO [4].


Please add the following claim, as the second sentence in the political positions section:

The District has also been described as "ancestrally Democratic, culturally conservative, multiethnic and viscerally patriotic" and earned a reputation as being home to Reagan Democrats <[5].


Please add the following claim, as the second sentence in the immigration section:

In 2020, he co-sponsored and voted for the American Dream and Promise Act. [6]

Please add the following claim, as the fifth sentence in the LGBTQ rights section:

Despite not co-sponsoring the Equality Act in 2020, he ultimately voted for it. [7]


Lipinskistaffer12 (talk) 19:14, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Simone Pathe. "Gillibrand PAC Endorses Lipinski Primary Challenger in Illinois". RollCall. Retrieved 1 August 2019.
  2. ^ "National Environmental Scorecard". League of Conservation Voters. Retrieved 1 August 2019.
  3. ^ "NRA Grades Archive". Everytown.org. Retrieved 1 August 2019.
  4. ^ "Rep. Daniel Lipinski". AFL-CIO. Retrieved 1 August 2019.
  5. ^ Barone, Michael; Richard E. Cohen (2005). The Almanac of American Politics 2006. Washington, D.C.: National Journal Group. p. 567. ISBN 0-89234-111-4.
  6. ^ Roll Call 240, H.R. 6
  7. ^ Roll Call 217, H.R. 5

Reply 26-JUN-2019

  Unable to review edit request  

  • Thank you for providing the verbatim text and locations, that was much appreciated.
  • Unfortunately, your edit request still cannot be reviewed because the provided references are not formatted correctly. The citation style predominantly used by the Dan Lipinski article is Citation Style 1 (CS1). The citation style used in the edit request consists of bare URL's.[a] Any requested edit of yours which may be implemented will need to resemble the current style already in use in the article – in this case, CS1. In the extended section below titled Citation style, I have illustrated two examples: one showing how the edit request was submitted, and another showing how requests should be submitted in the future:
Citation style
Bare URL reference formatting:

The Sun's diameter is 864,337 miles,[1] while the Moon's diameter is 2,159 miles.[2] The Sun's temperature is 5,778 degrees Kelvin.[3]

References


1. https://www.booksource.com
2. http://www.journalsource.com
3. http://www.websource.com

In the example above there are three URL's provided with the claim statements, but these URL's have not been placed using Citation Style 1, which is the style predominantly used by the Dan Lipinski article. Using this style, the WikiFormatted text should resemble the following:

Citation Style 1 formatting:

The Sun's diameter is 864,337 miles,<ref>{{cite book|last1=Sjöblad|first1=Tristan|title=The Sun|url=http://www.booksource.com|publisher=Academic Press|date=2018|page=1}}</ref> while the Moon's diameter is 2,159 miles.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Harinath|first1=Paramjit|title=Size of the Moon|journal=Science|issue=78|volume=51|url=http://www.journalsource.com|date=2018|page=46}}</ref> The Sun's temperature is 5,778 degrees Kelvin.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Uemura|first1=Shu|title=The Sun's Heat|url=http://www.websource.com|publisher=Academic Press|date=2018|page=2}}</ref>

Displays as:

The Sun's diameter is 864,337 miles,[1] while the Moon's diameter is 2,159 miles.[2] The Sun's temperature is 5,778 degrees Kelvin.[3]

References


  1. ^ Sjöblad, Tristan. The Sun. Academic Press, 2018, p. 1.
  2. ^ Harinath, Paramjit. "Size of the Moon", Science, 51(78):46.
  3. ^ Uemura, Shū. The Sun's Heat. Academic Press, 2018, p. 2.

In the example above the references have been formatted according to Citation Style 1, which shows the author, the source's name, date, etc., all information which is lost when only the links are provided. As Wikipedia is a volunteer project, edit requests such yours are generally expected to have this formatting done before the request is submitted for review.

Kindly rewrite your edit request so that it aligns more with the second example shown in the collapsed section above, and feel free to re-submit that edit request at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions about this formatting please don't hesitate to ask myself or another editor. Regards,  Spintendo  18:04, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

  1. ^ The use of bare URLs as references is a style which is acceptable for use in Wikipedia. However, general practice dictates that the style already in use for an article be the one that is subsequently used for all future additions unless changed by editorial consensus.[1]

References

  1. ^ "WP:CITEVAR - Wikipedia:Citing sources". Wikipedia. 20 October 2018. Retrieved 22 October 2018. Guideline: It is normal practice to defer to the style used by the first major contributor or adopted by the consensus of editors already working on the page, unless a change in consensus has been achieved. If the article you are editing is already using a particular citation style, you should follow it.

Request edit

In full disclosure I am a staffer for Congressman Lipinski. I am following up on my request for additional information to be displayed on his page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Lipinski. Please note I am not trying to promote the Congressman, but attempting to reflect a more accurate and well-rounded picture of him.


Please add the following claim, as the fourth sentence of the third paragraph of the opening section:

Despite his social conservatism, Lipinski has voted with the Democratic Party 87% of the time since he's been in Congress. [1]


Please add the following claim, as the fifth sentence of the third paragraph of the opening section:

Lipinski has a lifetime score of 90% from the League of Conservation Voters [2], an F grade from the National Rifle Association [3], and a 91% lifetime rating from the AFL-CIO [4].


Please add the following claim, as the second sentence in the political positions section:

The District has also been described as "ancestrally Democratic, culturally conservative, multiethnic and viscerally patriotic" and earned a reputation as being home to Reagan Democrats <[5].

Please add the following claim, as the third sentence in the political positions sections:

It earned a reputation as being home to Reagan Democrats when in the 1980 presidential election it was one of only two Chicago districts (out of nine) to be won by Republican Ronald Reagan [6].

Please add the following claim, as the second sentence in the immigration section:

In 2020, he co-sponsored and voted for the American Dream and Promise Act. [7]

Please add the following claim, as the fifth sentence in the LGBTQ rights section:

Despite not co-sponsoring the Equality Act in 2020, he ultimately voted for it. [8]


Lipinskistaffer12Lipinskistaffer12 (talk) 15:34, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Simone Pathe. "Gillibrand PAC Endorses Lipinski Primary Challenger in Illinois". RollCall. Retrieved 1 August 2019.
  2. ^ "National Environmental Scorecard". League of Conservation Voters. Retrieved 1 August 2019.
  3. ^ "NRA Grades Archive". Everytown.org. Retrieved 1 August 2019.
  4. ^ "Rep. Daniel Lipinski". AFL-CIO. Retrieved 1 August 2019.
  5. ^ Barone, Michael; Richard E. Cohen (2005). The Almanac of American Politics 2006. Washington, D.C.: National Journal Group. p. 567. ISBN 0-89234-111-4.
  6. ^ Guide to U.S. Elections (5th ed.). Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. 2005. p. 1217. ISBN 1-56802-981-0.
  7. ^ "Final Vote Results for Roll Call 240: HR 6". Recorded Vote; Question: On Passage; Bill Title: American Dream and Promise Act. U.S. House of Representatives. 4 Jun 2019.
  8. ^ "Final Vote Results for Roll Call 217: HR 5". Recorded Vote; Question: On Passage; Bill Title: Equality Act. U.S. House of Representatives. 17 May 2019.

Reply 1-AUG-2019

Below you will see where proposals from your request have been quoted with reviewer decisions and feedback inserted underneath, either accepting, declining or otherwise commenting upon your proposal(s). Please read the enclosed notes within the proposal review section below for information on each request.  Spintendo  18:42, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal review 1-AUG-2019

Despite his social conservatism, Lipinski has voted with his party 87% of the time since he's been in Congress.
Clarification needed.[note 1]


Lipinski has a lifetime score of 90% from the league of conservation voters, an F grade from the NRA, and a 91% lifetime rating from the AFL-CIO
Clarification needed.[note 2]


The District has also been described as "ancestrally Democratic, culturally conservative, multiethnic and viscerally patriotic" and earned a reputation as being home to Reagan Democrats
Clarification needed.[note 3]


In 2020, he co-sponsored and voted for the American Dream and Promise Act.
no Declined.[note 4]


Despite not co-sponsoring the Equality Act in 2020, he ultimately voted for it.
no Declined.[note 5]


___________

  1. ^ This claim should elaborate upon what is meant by the phrase "traditionally aligned". The claim also uses an imprecise term "most issues" which need to be delineated.
  2. ^ As these items are not WikiLinked, they need to explain in greater detail what each score means and how each score was chosen.
  3. ^ Please provide an additional source for this claim
  4. ^ The reference for this item is not formatted according to WP:CS1.
  5. ^ Ibid.

Request edit

In full disclosure I am a staffer for Congressman Lipinski. I am following up on my request for additional information to be displayed on his page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Lipinski. Please note I am not trying to promote the Congressman, but attempting to reflect a more accurate and well-rounded picture of him.


Please add the following claim, as the fourth sentence of the third paragraph of the opening section:

Despite his social conservatism, Lipinski has voted with the Democratic Party 87% of the time since he's been in Congress. [1]


Please add the following claim, as the fifth sentence of the third paragraph of the opening section:

Lipinski has a lifetime score of 90% from the League of Conservation Voters [2], an F grade from the National Rifle Association [3], and a 91% lifetime rating from the AFL-CIO [4].


Please add the following claim, as the second sentence in the political positions section:

The District has also been described as "ancestrally Democratic, culturally conservative, multiethnic and viscerally patriotic" and earned a reputation as being home to Reagan Democrats <[5].

Please add the following claim, as the third sentence in the political positions sections:

It earned a reputation as being home to Reagan Democrats when in the 1980 presidential election it was one of only two Chicago districts (out of nine) to be won by Republican Ronald Reagan [6].

Please add the following claim, as the second sentence in the immigration section:

In 2020, he co-sponsored and voted for the American Dream and Promise Act. [7]

Please add the following claim, as the fifth sentence in the LGBTQ rights section:

Despite not co-sponsoring the Equality Act in 2020, he ultimately voted for it. [8]

Lipinskistaffer12 (talk) 00:31, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Simone Pathe. "Gillibrand PAC Endorses Lipinski Primary Challenger in Illinois". RollCall. Retrieved 1 August 2019.
  2. ^ "National Environmental Scorecard". League of Conservation Voters. Retrieved 1 August 2019.
  3. ^ "NRA Grades Archive". Everytown.org. Retrieved 1 August 2019.
  4. ^ "Rep. Daniel Lipinski". AFL-CIO. Retrieved 1 August 2019.
  5. ^ Barone, Michael; Richard E. Cohen (2005). The Almanac of American Politics 2006. Washington, D.C.: National Journal Group. p. 567. ISBN 0-89234-111-4.
  6. ^ Guide to U.S. Elections (5th ed.). Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. 2005. p. 1217. ISBN 1-56802-981-0.
  7. ^ "Final Vote Results for Roll Call 240: HR 6". Recorded Vote; Question: On Passage; Bill Title: American Dream and Promise Act. U.S. House of Representatives. 4 Jun 2019.
  8. ^ "Final Vote Results for Roll Call 217: HR 5". Recorded Vote; Question: On Passage; Bill Title: Equality Act. U.S. House of Representatives. 17 May 2019.

Reply 27-SEP-2019

Below you will see where proposals from your request have been quoted with reviewer decisions and feedback inserted underneath, either accepting, declining or otherwise commenting upon your proposal(s). Please read the enclosed notes within the proposal review section below for information on each request.  Spintendo  22:19, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal review 27-SEP-2019

Despite his social conservatism, Lipinski has voted with the Democratic Party 87% of the time since he's been in Congress.
Clarification needed.[note 1]


Lipinski has a lifetime score of 90% from the League of Conservation Voters, an F grade from the National Rifle Association, and a 91% lifetime rating from the AFL-CIO.
Clarification needed.[note 2]


The District has also been described as "ancestrally Democratic, culturally conservative, multiethnic and viscerally patriotic" and earned a reputation as being home to Reagan Democrats. It earned a reputation as being home to Reagan Democrats when in the 1980 presidential election it was one of only two Chicago districts (out of nine) to be won by Republican Ronald Reagan.
no Declined.[note 3]


In 2020, he co-sponsored and voted for the American Dream and Promise Act. Despite not co-sponsoring the Equality Act in 2020, he ultimately voted for it.
Clarification needed.[note 4]


___________

  1. ^ It is not known what is meant by the term social conservatism.
  2. ^ Although the main terms have been WikiLinked, the supplementary terms, including "lifetime score", "F grade", and "lifetime rating" have not been Wikilinked. Not having these terms Wikilinked or else explained in some fashion leaves their descriptions bereft of meaning.
  3. ^ These claims were originally asked to provide additional references which verified their contents. The additional reference thus provided was merely a US Elections Guide, when WP:SECONDARY sources are to be preferred. Additionally, the quoted phrase does not contain proper attribution (e.g., "According to authors Michael Barone and Richard Cohen, the District has been described as[a] 'ancestrally Democratic, culturally conservative, multiethnic and viscerally patriotic'").
  4. ^ The mentioned Act's references are now correctly formatted according to WP:CS1, but the Acts themselves are not WikiLinked.

Notes

  1. ^ The phrase "has been described as" should be used if the district is being described that way not by the authors, but by others collectively according to the author's research; otherwise, the phrase "is described as" should be used if the district is being described directly that way by the authors themselves.

Leaving office

Lipinski will apparently leave office at the end of this term, after losing a primary to another candidate (Newman). This is mentioned way at the end of the intro section. I'd like to move this to just after the 1st paragraph unless someone objects. There will obviously have to be an update when he leaves office either way. Newman won the general election for the seat last week so I'll mention that in the existing paragraph. I don't know if it was seriously contested by the other party. 2602:24A:DE47:BB20:50DE:F402:42A6:A17D (talk) 19:15, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced Death Info

I have reverted an unsourced edit which claimed that Lipinski recently died. If in fact, Lipinski is dead, a reliable source needs to be cited for that information.--TommyBoy (talk) 02:42, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]