Talk:Alameda Corridor

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

California: Southern California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Trains Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Corridor impact good or bad?

The Corridor improvements do add capacity for moving rail cars, but I have read that the 710 freeway is worse, not better, because shippers are using trucks to avoid high corridor fees. True or false? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.175.225.22 (talk • contribs).

Unkown, but apparently false. However, the Alameda Corridor Authority is attempting to capture the short-haul truck traffic otherwise being sent up the 710 freeway, and which for whatever reason is skipping the corridor. ACA Current Projects.

Does anyone know more about this? The Interstate 110 (California) article claims that "[t]he Harbor Freeway, along with the Long Beach Freeway, are the principal means for freight to get from the port of Los Angeles to rail yards and warehouses further inland." The article ignores the Alameda Corridor completely, but before I edited that, I wanted to check if the volume of traffic really is substantially more on the 110 and the 710 than in the corridor. So far, Google has failed me on finding data on this matter, but I did read somewhere that cargo trucked between the harbor and the railyards are charged the same fees per container as if they were going through the corridor (I'm not sure how this would be enforced--perhaps a LA city or county ordinance that obligates the ports to charge the same fees). Any info, anyone? cluth 04:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The ACA website probably has their version of the facts. Keep in mind that the Alameda Corridor is only good for those goods that are destined for rail transport outside of the LA Basin. There is also quite a bit of port traffic that has local destinations, which will NEVER use the Alameda Corridor. I think I read a statistics that the corridor was only capturing 1/2 of the port cargo that was destined for outside the LA Basin. ^Blank ^Verse 12:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The ACA website says "A train emits significantly less pollutants than the 250-280 trucks it replaces." and that there are currently about 43 trains per day. That's 10750-12040 trucks off the road! Wow! ƕ (talk) 19:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of the Corridor

I have a photo of the Alameda Corridor that I'm willing to share for this article. It's a bit of a challenge to photograph the corridor; hopefully at some point someone will find or take a better photograpg. http://www.flickr.com/photos/thomasbrightbill/3995028610 ThomasBrightbill (talk) 06:30, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alameda Corridor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151009000316/http://www.aaroads.com/high-priority/corr22.php to http://www.aaroads.com/high-priority/corr22.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:08, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]