Talk:Salusa Secundus
This page was proposed for deletion by Piotrus (talk · contribs) on 29 November 2019. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
Odd to read that Salusa Secundus is the third plant in its system.... Wetman 20:31, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Haha, that's a good point. Also I enjoy responding to discussion posts made two years ago. --24.125.175.229 02:58, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, me too.90.194.186.31 (talk) 01:00, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
- Personally I prefer to give it about 10 years of thought before responding. Best not to rush in to things.Crobar (talk) 07:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- This. Is. Hilarious. lol — TAnthonyTalk 14:20, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Personally I prefer to give it about 10 years of thought before responding. Best not to rush in to things.Crobar (talk) 07:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, me too.90.194.186.31 (talk) 01:00, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Redirect
User:TAnthony offered a redirect from this article to Dune prequel series#Legends of Dune with the following rationale: Boldly redirect; not enough here for an individual article, and sources do not really assert notability..
The rationale could be correct, but the target looks clumsy as this article currently evokes other novels than the prequel Legends of Dune and the section where the article redirect to doesn't contain information about Salusa Secundus.
Solution to this issue could be to make this article notable and with content or to redirect to a section explaining what Salusa Secundus is. Such target article should be still identified. --Dereckson (talk) 12:16, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Dereckson: for notability, we need references that are not connected with the topic that discuss it in detail. At the moment, all the references seem to be the novels themselves. --Slashme (talk) 12:27, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- That doesn't address the concern the section it's redirected to doesn't speak about the notion of the article. --Dereckson (talk) 15:15, 24 October 2020 (UTC)