User talk:Woodroar

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

text based browser games - The Grail Lords

Hello Woodroar,

On 26th of August I've tried adding The Grail Lords to the wiki list of text based browser games. I noticed that you did made my attempt to add the game to the list undone for being non-notable.

Having very little experience with contributing to Wikipedia I was wondering if there is a way to have The Grail Lords added as one of the text based browser games. The game exists for over 14 years and has a small but dedicated community and I believe it's worth being mentioned.

Yours sincerely,

Gerard — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1811:D30:D000:C439:F3E4:D5EB:6EE0 (talk) 09:21, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gerard! In order to get listed at List of text-based massively multiplayer online role-playing games, The Grail Lords would need an article on Wikipedia. And to qualify for an article (we call that being "notable"), there would need to be significant coverage of the game in reliable, third-party sources. That means games/technology journalism, books, journals, and so on. Unfortunately, I'm not seeing any good coverage of The Grail Lords right now. But if you're a fan of the game, you might know of some sources we could use.

If you're interested in looking for sources, I'd suggest reading our general page on reliable sources and then our our specific page on sources for game content. If you have any questions, please let me know. Cheers! Woodroar (talk) 12:45, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your quick and kind reply!

I don't think there is much notable coverage from a reliable source about the game available but I will see what I can find and if possible add a new article on Wikipedia.

Stay safe and have a nice weekend ahead.

Gerard — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1811:D30:D000:C439:F3E4:D5EB:6EE0 (talk) 12:57, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes indie game developers spend all of their time on the game and never get around to promoting it, which means that games journalists never hear about it. It's too bad! Anyways, have a great weekend and stay safe, too! Woodroar (talk) 13:20, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ray Davies personal life edit

Hey, I noticed you undid my edit about his sexuality and I agree that maybe "bisexual" may not be the best way to phrase him expressing his attraction to men on multiple occasions in interviews, but it seemed like the least clunky way to put it and is the definition of "bisexual." If you have any ideas on a less simplistic way to express that info, please suggest it. Do you think adding the specific quotes from the interviews would be better? I just didn't want to make that the bulk of the section and noticed that someone previously had already simplified it as "Davies is bisexual", so I thought that was the best way to go. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.120.80.58 (talk • contribs) 05:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied at Talk:Ray Davies#Bisexuality. Cheers! Woodroar (talk) 13:14, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brie Larson

You've had ample time to respond, but have not. How DARE you speak to me like I am new. How DARE you speak to me like you are staff. You are NOT staff. You spend your time on wiki bullying editors, without care for refs.

'We don't really have staff'.. in fact yes we do have staff:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_administrators/Active I would enjoy to hear their thoughts on your habitual bullying of other editors.

Dava4444 (talk) 21:49, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlawful Editing

I am providing notice to you of my concerns reguarding your unlawful edits to the page of Eric R. Braverman. Who is paying you to edit the page of Eric R. Braverman? If you do not cease and desist I will escalate this dispute to Wikipedia's dispute resolution process.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dtmohyi (talk • contribs)

@Dtmohyi: See WP:No legal threats and WP:Assume good faith. The latter is a foundational site policy. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User_Dtmohyi. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 21:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

== Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ==

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.