Talk:Blam (Lichtenstein)

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Comics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts

A fact from Blam (Lichtenstein) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 May 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Blam was one of the works from Roy Lichtenstein's first solo exhibition that was sold out in advance?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/May.

Wikipedia

Not "realism"

...the narrative is unnecessary due to the eminent realism presented. No, whether'eminent' or 'obscure'. For some idea of what painterly realism looks like, compare realism (arts). Try "clear, simplistic graphic illustration" or something along that line.-- Wetman (talk) 10:50, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

non free content

The excessive quotations from copyrighted works in the footnotes are unnecessary to the understanding of the article. The content in the footnotes could be recast in original wording, removing the need to quote so extensively. Please see Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria and Wikipedia:Non-free content regarding using copyrighted material without permission in Wikipedia. Thanks, MathewTownsend (talk) 17:51, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]